IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1001860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Cost Essential Antihypertensive Medicines for Hypertension Control in China: A Modelling Study

Author

Listed:
  • Dongfeng Gu
  • Jiang He
  • Pamela G Coxson
  • Petra W Rasmussen
  • Chen Huang
  • Anusorn Thanataveerat
  • Keane Y Tzong
  • Juyang Xiong
  • Miao Wang
  • Dong Zhao
  • Lee Goldman
  • Andrew E Moran

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is China’s leading cardiovascular disease risk factor. Improved hypertension control in China would result in result in enormous health gains in the world’s largest population. A computer simulation model projected the cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment in Chinese adults, assuming a range of essential medicines list drug costs. Methods and Findings: The Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model-China, a Markov-style computer simulation model, simulated hypertension screening, essential medicines program implementation, hypertension control program administration, drug treatment and monitoring costs, disease-related costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by preventing cardiovascular disease or lost because of drug side effects in untreated hypertensive adults aged 35–84 y over 2015–2025. Cost-effectiveness was assessed in cardiovascular disease patients (secondary prevention) and for two blood pressure ranges in primary prevention (stage one, 140–159/90–99 mm Hg; stage two, ≥160/≥100 mm Hg). Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension and combined systolic and diastolic hypertension were modeled as a reduction in systolic blood pressure; treatment of isolated diastolic hypertension was modeled as a reduction in diastolic blood pressure. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses explored ranges of antihypertensive drug effectiveness and costs, monitoring frequency, medication adherence, side effect severity, background hypertension prevalence, antihypertensive medication treatment, case fatality, incidence and prevalence, and cardiovascular disease treatment costs. Median antihypertensive costs from Shanghai and Yunnan province were entered into the model in order to estimate the effects of very low and high drug prices. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios less than the per capita gross domestic product of China (11,900 international dollars [Int$] in 2015) were considered cost-effective. Treating hypertensive adults with prior cardiovascular disease for secondary prevention was projected to be cost saving in the main simulation and 100% of probabilistic simulation results. Treating all hypertension for primary and secondary prevention would prevent about 800,000 cardiovascular disease events annually (95% uncertainty interval, 0.6 to 1.0 million) and was borderline cost-effective incremental to treating only cardiovascular disease and stage two patients (2015 Int$13,000 per QALY gained [95% uncertainty interval, Int$10,000 to Int$18,000]). Of all one-way sensitivity analyses, assuming adherence to taking medications as low as 25%, high Shanghai drug costs, or low medication efficacy led to the most unfavorable results (treating all hypertension, about Int$47,000, Int$37,000, and Int$27,000 per QALY were gained, respectively). The strengths of this study were the use of a recent Chinese national health survey, vital statistics, health care costs, and cohort study outcomes data as model inputs and reliance on clinical-trial-based estimates of coronary heart disease and stroke risk reduction due to antihypertensive medication treatment. The limitations of the study were the use of several sources of data, limited clinical trial evidence for medication effectiveness and harms in the youngest and oldest age groups, lack of information about geographic and ethnic subgroups, lack of specific information about indirect costs borne by patients, and uncertainty about the future epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases in China. Conclusions: Expanded hypertension treatment has the potential to prevent about 800,000 cardiovascular disease events annually and be borderline cost-effective in China, provided low-cost essential antihypertensive medicines programs can be implemented. In a Markov-style simulation model, Andrew Moran and colleagues estimate the reduction in cardiovascular disease and cost-effectiveness of broad provision of antihypertensive medications in China.Background: Worldwide, in 2008, more than one billion people had high blood pressure (hypertension), a condition that is responsible for about 10 million deaths annually from heart attacks, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Hypertension, which rarely has any symptoms, is diagnosed by measuring blood pressure (BP), the force that blood circulating in the body exerts on the inside of large blood vessels. BP is highest when the heart contracts to pump blood out (systolic BP) and lowest when the heart relaxes and refills (diastolic BP). Normal adult BP is defined as a systolic BP of less than 120 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) and a diastolic BP of less than 80 mm Hg (a BP of

Suggested Citation

  • Dongfeng Gu & Jiang He & Pamela G Coxson & Petra W Rasmussen & Chen Huang & Anusorn Thanataveerat & Keane Y Tzong & Juyang Xiong & Miao Wang & Dong Zhao & Lee Goldman & Andrew E Moran, 2015. "The Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Cost Essential Antihypertensive Medicines for Hypertension Control in China: A Modelling Study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001860
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001860
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001860&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001860?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zijing Pan & Wanchun Xu & Zhong Li & Chengzhong Xu & Fangfang Lu & Pei Zhang & Liang Zhang & Ting Ye, 2020. "Trajectories of Outpatient Service Utilisation of Hypertensive Patients in Tertiary Hospitals in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Yawen Jiang & Weiyi Ni, 2019. "Economic Evaluation of the 2016 Chinese Guideline and Alternative Risk Thresholds of Initiating Statin Therapy for the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(7), pages 943-952, July.
    3. Xian Li & Stephen Jan & Lijing L Yan & Alison Hayes & Yunbo Chu & Haijun Wang & Xiangxian Feng & Wenyi Niu & Feng J He & Jun Ma & Yanbo Han & Graham A MacGregor & Yangfeng Wu, 2017. "Cost and cost-effectiveness of a school-based education program to reduce salt intake in children and their families in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Yang Zhao & Ajay Singh Mahal & Tilahun Nigatu Haregu & Ameera Katar & Brian Oldenburg & Luwen Zhang, 2019. "Trends and Inequalities in the Health Care and Hypertension Outcomes in China, 2011 to 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Thi-Phuong-Lan Nguyen & E Pamela Wright & Thanh-Trung Nguyen & C C M Schuiling-Veninga & M J Bijlsma & Thi-Bach-Yen Nguyen & M J Postma, 2016. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for and Managing Identified Hypertension for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Vietnam," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.