IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1001671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols

Author

Listed:
  • George Peat
  • Richard D Riley
  • Peter Croft
  • Katherine I Morley
  • Panayiotis A Kyzas
  • Karel G M Moons
  • Pablo Perel
  • Ewout W Steyerberg
  • Sara Schroter
  • Douglas G Altman
  • Harry Hemingway
  • for the PROGRESS Group

Abstract

: George Peat and colleagues review and discuss current approaches to transparency and published debates and concerns about efforts to standardize prognosis research practice, and make five recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • George Peat & Richard D Riley & Peter Croft & Katherine I Morley & Panayiotis A Kyzas & Karel G M Moons & Pablo Perel & Ewout W Steyerberg & Sara Schroter & Douglas G Altman & Harry Hemingway & for th, 2014. "Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-8, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001671
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001671
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001671&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Merton S. Krause, 2019. "Replication and preregistration," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(5), pages 2647-2652, September.
    2. Lisa M Federer & Ya-Ling Lu & Douglas J Joubert & Judith Welsh & Barbara Brandys, 2015. "Biomedical Data Sharing and Reuse: Attitudes and Practices of Clinical and Scientific Research Staff," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Charles Abongomera & Saskia van Henten & Florian Vogt & Jozefien Buyze & Kristien Verdonck & Johan van Griensven, 2020. "Prognostic factors for mortality among patients with visceral leishmaniasis in East Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1001671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.