IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0007574.html

Epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region: A descriptive analysis of stakeholder distribution, patterns, and regional variation

Author

Listed:
  • Rim Alaeddine
  • Zahraa Chamseddine
  • Nour Zaouk
  • Zeinab Awad
  • Zahi Abdul Sater
  • Shadi Saleh

Abstract

Epidemic and pandemic preparedness relies on multi-sectoral coordination, a competent workforce, and well-defined preparedness functions. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, preparedness is shaped by diverse health system capacities, political contexts and recurrent crises. Despite recurrent outbreaks in the region, limited regional-level evidence exists on who is involved in preparedness and how different roles are distributed across preparedness domains, as well as countries and income settings. This cross-sectional stakeholder mapping study identified stakeholder roles, affiliations, and organizations involved in epidemic and pandemic preparedness across 22 MENA countries. Using publicly available online sources, stakeholder roles were systematically identified and categorized according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) public health emergency preparedness framework. Records were analyzed by preparedness domain, workforce category, organizational affiliation, country, income level, and gender. A total of 3555 stakeholder roles were identified across the region. Roles were predominantly classified under coordination and communication (38.4%) and health services (32.0%), while emergency risk communication (4.1%) and policy development, adaptation, and implementation (6.6%) were the least represented domains. Emergency management roles constituted the largest workforce group (42.6%), followed by public health professionals (28.3%) and clinicians (19.4%). Significant variation was observed across country income levels, including differences in preparedness domains, workforce categories, organizational affiliation, and gender distribution. Records associated with women accounted for 31.5% of the total roles, with their representation varying across income groups. Preparedness-related roles were identified across the MENA region but vary in their distribution across domains, workforce categories, and countries. The greater representation of records in operational roles, alongside limited representation in policy development and emergency risk communication, highlights differences in the publicly identifiable preparedness landscape across functions. These findings provide a regional descriptive overview that can inform future validation, stakeholder engagement, and capacity-building efforts across the MENA region.

Suggested Citation

  • Rim Alaeddine & Zahraa Chamseddine & Nour Zaouk & Zeinab Awad & Zahi Abdul Sater & Shadi Saleh, 2026. "Epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region: A descriptive analysis of stakeholder distribution, patterns, and regional variation," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007574
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007574
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007574&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.