IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0007539.html

Delivering balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplements to pregnant and breastfeeding women in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela C Kissell
  • Isabel Potani
  • Carolina Pereira
  • Elisabeth T Mukendi
  • Vani Sethi
  • Filomena Gomes
  • Rimu Byadya
  • Lisa M Rogers
  • Saskia J M Osendarp
  • Charity Zvandaziva
  • Saskia de Pee
  • Martin N Mwangi

Abstract

In settings where more than 20% of women of reproductive age are classified as underweight, the World Health Organization recommends balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplementation during pregnancy to reduce adverse birth outcomes. However, guidance on contextually acceptable and feasible supplement delivery platforms remains limited, posing critical challenges for implementation. We synthesized literature on acceptable and feasible delivery platforms for BEP supplementation (direct evidence), as well as iron and folic acid (IFA) or multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS; indirect evidence) to pregnant and breastfeeding women (PBW) to broaden the search scope. A systematic search was conducted across five databases and grey literature to identify studies that addressed the acceptability and feasibility of BEP supplement delivery platforms in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), at facility and community levels. We identified 48 studies conducted in LMICs: 22 specifically evaluated BEP supplement delivery, while 26 evaluated IFA or MMS. In the direct evidence, home delivery (11/22) was the most frequently mentioned delivery platforms of BEP supplements followed by community-level feeding centers (provided cooked meals or take-home rations) anchored by frontline community health workers (8/22 studies) and antenatal care (ANC) at health facilities (6/22; some studies assessed multiple delivery platforms). Only four studies assessed preferred BEP delivery platforms, and PBW favored home over facility-based delivery. Authors attributed this preference to the comprehensive nutrition education and behavior change communication (BCC) provided during home delivery. Indirect evidence showed that enhancing delivery of IFA or MMS at health facilities (not specific) through strategies such as BCC and home visits may improve supplement compliance. Overall, limited evidence exists regarding market-based approaches for delivering any of these interventions. Based on existing evidence, scale-up delivery of BEP supplementation through ANC at health centers, enhanced by community health workers may be feasible in reaching PBW, especially when combined with BCC.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela C Kissell & Isabel Potani & Carolina Pereira & Elisabeth T Mukendi & Vani Sethi & Filomena Gomes & Rimu Byadya & Lisa M Rogers & Saskia J M Osendarp & Charity Zvandaziva & Saskia de Pee & Mart, 2026. "Delivering balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplements to pregnant and breastfeeding women in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007539
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007539
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007539&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.