IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0007435.html

Barriers to prevention and healthcare-seeking in a fragile humanitarian setting: Evidence from Yemen during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Ola El Hajj Hassan
  • Ahmed Asa'ad Al-Aghbari
  • Huda Omer Basaleem
  • Khaled Abdulla Al-Sakkaf
  • Dalia Hyzam
  • Ahmad Siyar Noormal
  • Albrecht Jahn
  • Fekri Dureab

Abstract

The healthcare system in Yemen is confronted with substantial challenges, especially during pandemics such as COVID-19. In Aden, the COVID-19 pandemic occurred in the context of prolonged conflict, health-system fragility, resource constraints and other ongoing humanitarian challenges.This study aims to explore the barriers community members in Aden face in adopting COVID-19 preventive measures and seeking healthcare during the pandemic, and to identify implications for future outbreak preparedness in fragile humanitarian settings. A qualitative study involving 25 in-depth interviews was conducted with adult community members in Aden. Participants’ perceptions of COVID-19 and reported preventive practices were also explored to contextualise the barriers influencing prevention and healthcare-seeking. Interview data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis; the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) was applied as an interpretive framework to contextualise barriers across five interacting levels: intrapersonal/individual, interpersonal, organisational/institutional, community, and public policy/structural. Participants described barriers across five SEM levels: intrapersonal/individual barriers included denial, fear, perceived ineffectiveness of preventive measures and financial constraints; interpersonal barriers included stigma, mockery and social pressure; organisational/institutional barriers included perceived service refusal, concerns about infection prevention and staff preparedness, long waiting times, limited diagnostic testing, increased treatment costs and shortages of medical supplies; community-level barriers included rumours, misinformation and mistrust; and public policy/structural barriers included limited financial support, inadequate implementation of preventive measures, conflict-related constraints and perceived insufficient preparedness. The findings suggest that barriers to prevention and healthcare-seeking were interconnected across the five levels of the socio-ecological context, with individual perceptions and behaviours occurring within interpersonal, organisational, community and wider public policy and structural conditions. Future outbreak preparedness in fragile settings should therefore combine trusted, culturally appropriate risk communication, community engagement, accessible preventive resources, strengthened infection-prevention capacity, diagnostic and referral pathways, and continuity of essential health services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ola El Hajj Hassan & Ahmed Asa'ad Al-Aghbari & Huda Omer Basaleem & Khaled Abdulla Al-Sakkaf & Dalia Hyzam & Ahmad Siyar Noormal & Albrecht Jahn & Fekri Dureab, 2026. "Barriers to prevention and healthcare-seeking in a fragile humanitarian setting: Evidence from Yemen during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007435
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007435
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007435&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.