IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0007412.html

Factors associated with the unmet need for spacing and limiting family planning: Evidence from a national survey

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Khairul Alam
  • Rumana Rois

Abstract

Traditional binary frameworks tend to combine the various aspects of unmet family planning needs into one general category. This study evaluates unmet family planning needs by first using conventional multinomial logistic regression to determine baseline demographic risk profiles. It then applies machine learning methods such as Random Forest and XGBoost to see if they can provide further insights into non-linear patterns and complex interactions between features that standard regression might miss. Using data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS 2022), we built a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model. Additionally, we applied sophisticated ensemble classifiers such as Random Forest and XGBoost, paired with a synthetic hybrid resampling technique (SMOTE) to address severe class imbalance. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm, and we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to visualize complex global patterns and interaction effects. Bivariate analysis showed significant associations between unmet needs and maternal age, parity, wealth, residence, and decision-making power (p

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Khairul Alam & Rumana Rois, 2026. "Factors associated with the unmet need for spacing and limiting family planning: Evidence from a national survey," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007412
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007412
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007412&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.