IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0007221.html

Urinary incontinence in Ugandan gynecologic outpatient clinics: Prevalence, clinical types, and associated factors

Author

Listed:
  • John Katongole
  • Emmanuel Okurut
  • Daniel Udofia Owu
  • Theoneste Hakizimana
  • Prosper Akankwasa
  • Ester Namutosi
  • Musa Kasujja

Abstract

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common but underrecognized condition among women, including within routine gynecologic outpatient care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Evidence from referral-level gynecologic outpatient settings in Uganda remains limited. This study therefore determined the prevalence, clinical types, and associated factors of UI among women attending gynecologic outpatient clinics in Uganda. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 374 non-pregnant women attending gynecologic outpatient clinics at Kayunga and Jinja Regional Referral Hospitals (RRH). UI and its clinical types were assessed using the Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID). Data on associated factors were collected using structured interviews, and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with UI. Among the 374 women enrolled, 103 had UI, giving a prevalence of 27.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.1 to 32.3). The most common subtype was stress UI (44.7%), followed by urgency UI (30.1%) and mixed UI (25.2%). Increasing age was independently associated with UI, with higher odds among women aged 30–39 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.10), 40–49 years (AOR 2.63, 95% CI 1.18 to 5.88), and 50 years or older (AOR 4.95, 95% CI 1.25 to 19.56) compared with women younger than 30 years. No formal education (AOR 4.34, 95% CI 1.29 to 14.55), high parity of four or more deliveries (AOR 2.97, 95% CI 1.21 to 7.26), and prolonged labor lasting more than 24 hours (AOR 2.46, 95% CI 1.37 to 4.40) were also independently associated with UI. Urinary incontinence affected approximately one in four women attending gynecologic outpatient clinics in Uganda, with stress UI as the predominant subtype. Routine UI screening in gynecologic outpatient services and strengthened obstetric and postpartum care may help reduce the burden of UI in similar referral settings.

Suggested Citation

  • John Katongole & Emmanuel Okurut & Daniel Udofia Owu & Theoneste Hakizimana & Prosper Akankwasa & Ester Namutosi & Musa Kasujja, 2026. "Urinary incontinence in Ugandan gynecologic outpatient clinics: Prevalence, clinical types, and associated factors," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007221
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007221
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007221&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007221?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.