IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0007120.html

Evaluating the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation fidelity of a multipurpose mobile health (mHealth) app used for Tuberculosis (TB) contact tracing by Ward-Based Outreach Teams (WBOTs) in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Don Lawrence Mudzengi
  • Lindiwe Tsope
  • Piotr Hippner
  • Fezeka Mboniswa
  • Thapelo Mpanza
  • Tanyaradzwa Dube
  • Richard Lessells
  • Indira Govender
  • Dumile Gumede
  • Alison D Grant
  • Katherine Fielding
  • Candice M Chetty-Makkan
  • Kavindhran Velen
  • Salome Charalambous

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used to support community-based healthcare. However, their real-world impact often remains unclear. Understanding implementation factors is essential for advancing their use and achieving meaningful health outcomes. We evaluated an mHealth tool (AitaHealth) after customising its modules and workflows for household Tuberculosis (TB) contact tracing and other community-based data collection by community health workers (CHWs). We describe the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation fidelity of this approach. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation in two South African districts: uMkhanyakude and Ekurhuleni. We collected qualitative data through focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with CHWs, team leaders, and key stakeholders. We used deductive thematic analysis grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to assess the acceptability and implementation feasibility of the mHealth tool. We used quantitative data from the AitaHealth metadata to assess implementation fidelity. CHWs appreciated AitaHealth’s efficiency, data security, and credibility. Across the two districts, 103 CHWs recorded data for 2,452 households and 10,649 household members. However, they reported challenges in ease of use, with unreliable devices, weak support, and safety concerns hindering data collection. These issues led to inconsistent engagement, with 48.5% of CHWs logging in fewer than 15 times during implementation. Despite these challenges, when used, AitaHealth ensured high-quality data collection and household coverage, with TB-related fields completed in over 94% of households, demonstrating its potential under better conditions. AitaHealth`s limitations stemmed from system constraints rather than user resistance. To achieve full impact, mHealth tools require reliable infrastructure and supportive environments for both the tools and their implementers.

Suggested Citation

  • Don Lawrence Mudzengi & Lindiwe Tsope & Piotr Hippner & Fezeka Mboniswa & Thapelo Mpanza & Tanyaradzwa Dube & Richard Lessells & Indira Govender & Dumile Gumede & Alison D Grant & Katherine Fielding &, 2026. "Evaluating the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation fidelity of a multipurpose mobile health (mHealth) app used for Tuberculosis (TB) contact tracing by Ward-Based Outreach Teams (WBOTs) in South Africa," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007120
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0007120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0007120&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0007120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.