IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0006910.html

Bridging the birth dose gap: A scoping review of implementation challenges for birth dose and rotavirus vaccines in low- and middle-income countries

Author

Listed:
  • Mei Neni Sitaresmi
  • Risalia Reni Arisanti
  • Vicka Oktaria
  • Adzilla Fikria
  • Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi
  • Alya Nur Fadhilah
  • Indah Kartika Murni
  • Indah Rosmawati
  • Intan Cahyani
  • Candora Tambunan
  • Justin C Graves
  • Navpreet Singh
  • Stella Benita
  • Niken Widyastuti
  • Tetrawindu Hidayatullah
  • Atiek Anartati
  • Endang Budi Hastuti
  • Devi Anisiska
  • Prima Yosephine

Abstract

Rotavirus vaccination (RVV) has substantially reduced childhood diarrhoeal morbidity and mortality globally. However, interest in neonatal or birth-dose schedules is increasing to provide earlier protection and potentially reduce intussusception risk. Understanding barriers and implementation challenges of current RVV and other birth-dose vaccines (BDVs), including hepatitis B birth dose, Bacillus Calmette–Guérin, and oral polio vaccine, is essential to inform this transition in low- and middle-income countries. This review therefore aims to examine the supply- and demand-side factors influencing the uptake, timeliness, and implementation of RVV and BDV in low- and middle-income countries. A scoping review was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and grey literature from Portal Garuda from database inception to 5 March 2025. Original studies assessing determinants, enablers, and barriers of any BDV or RVV implementation, uptake, or timeliness were included. An analytical framework was developed inductively to classify factors as supply- or demand-side and was refined through discussions among reviewers. From 8,502 identified records, a total of 93 articles were included in the review. Identified supply-side enablers and barriers encompassed domains related to policy and governance, health system capacity, healthcare accessibility, and programmatic interventions. On the demand side, key enablers included higher caregiver education, higher socioeconomic status, health facility birth, and older maternal age, whereas major barriers included home birth, lower socioeconomic status, rural residence for BDV, and incomplete or delayed uptake of other routine vaccinations for RVV. Implementation and uptake of BDV and RVV were influenced by both supply- and demand-side factors, including policy support, health system capacity and access, targeted interventions, and socioeconomic disparities in vaccine uptake. Transitioning from infant-dose to birth-dose RVV will require addressing existing implementation challenges and ensuring timely vaccination at birth to achieve equitable coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei Neni Sitaresmi & Risalia Reni Arisanti & Vicka Oktaria & Adzilla Fikria & Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi & Alya Nur Fadhilah & Indah Kartika Murni & Indah Rosmawati & Intan Cahyani & Candora Tambunan , 2026. "Bridging the birth dose gap: A scoping review of implementation challenges for birth dose and rotavirus vaccines in low- and middle-income countries," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-32, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006910
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006910
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006910&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.