IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0006640.html

Community health volunteers as a frontline platform for antimicrobial resistance mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Briton M Kavulavu
  • Eric O Omwenga
  • Eden H Bukosia
  • Norrah N Muendo
  • Rael J Too

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health crisis disproportionately affecting sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where it was directly responsible for approximately 255,000 deaths in 2019 alone. Despite this burden, community-level mitigation strategies remain underdeveloped. Community health volunteers (CHVs), embedded within their communities and trusted by populations with limited healthcare access, represent an underutilised but promising platform for AMR mitigation. This scoping review aimed to map the breadth, nature, and outcomes of CHV-led or CHV-supported AMR interventions in SSA; identify barriers and facilitators to implementation; and identify evidence gaps to inform future research and policy. Following the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) framework and reported according to PRISMA-ScR 2018 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, AJOL, WHO IRIS, and grey literature for studies published from January 2018 to January 2026. Studies conducted in SSA involving CHVs and addressing AMR mitigation through at least one of education, surveillance, diagnostics, waste management, or One Health approaches were eligible. Data were charted using a standardised extraction form and findings synthesised narratively. Of 847 records identified, 26 studies and reports met the inclusion criteria. The evidence base encompassed educational interventions (n = 14), diagnostic integration (n = 3), waste and environmental management (n = 3), and multisectoral One Health approaches (n = 6). CHV-led educational interventions improved AMR knowledge by 49.3%–97.1% and reduced inappropriate antibiotic prescribing by 18–44%. Point-of-care diagnostic integration reduced antibiotic use by up to 24.6% without increasing adverse outcomes. Key barriers included inadequate resources, training overload, weak regulation, and lack of integrated surveillance, while facilitators included tailored training, diagnostic tools, community trust, and policy alignment. The evidence supports embedding structured AMR roles for CHVs within national AMR action plans, integrated community case management, One Health frameworks, and investment in CHV training and diagnostic capacity.

Suggested Citation

  • Briton M Kavulavu & Eric O Omwenga & Eden H Bukosia & Norrah N Muendo & Rael J Too, 2026. "Community health volunteers as a frontline platform for antimicrobial resistance mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006640
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006640
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006640&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.