Author
Listed:
- Pushpita Samina
- Puneet Dewan
- Chase Mertz
- Mikashmi Kohli
- Madhukar Pai
Abstract
The world is far from achieving universal access to rapid tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics that align with the World Health Organization (WHO) TB diagnostic standard. Although WHO-recommended molecular rapid diagnostics (mWRDs), including low-complexity automated nucleic acid amplification tests (LCaNAAT), have significantly improved TB detection, high capital, maintenance, and consumable costs have constrained scale-up. Recently, lower-cost, near-point-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests (NPOCs) have emerged offering the potential to expand access to rapid TB diagnosis while reducing the financial burden. To better understand the budget impact of using newer NPOCs as the initial TB diagnostic compared with established mWRDs, we developed a flexible cost calculator. Developed in Microsoft Excel, key parameters were organized in a structured input sheet using standardized labels. Separate worksheets defined diagnostic scenarios and performed calculations, with results summarized in an overview covering various costs. After validation, the model was converted into R (version 2025.09.1 + 401). The app (app.R), developed with Shiny, is available here for free global access. Using two hypothetical countries, we compared current LCaNAAT- based testing strategies with scenarios in which NPOCs were implemented as the initial diagnostic test. In hypothetical Country A, there were cost savings of 56.4% in Scenario 1 (based on current testing trends) and 60.5% in Scenario 2 (based on ambitious testing goals). In hypothetical Country B, the corresponding cost differences were 44.2% in Scenario 1 and 59% in Scenario 2. The analysis showed that countries can reach ambitious TB testing targets over 3 years using NPOCs at roughly the same total cost as implementing one year of current LCaNAAT testing. This highlights the potential of cheaper molecular diagnostics to significantly improve access to mWRDs. By reducing capital and maintenance costs, NPOC platforms let TB programs test and detect more cases within existing budgets, accelerating progress toward universal rapid TB diagnosis.
Suggested Citation
Pushpita Samina & Puneet Dewan & Chase Mertz & Mikashmi Kohli & Madhukar Pai, 2026.
"An online, open-access, cost comparison tool for presumptive tuberculosis testing using low complexity, automated, nucleic acid amplification tests (LCaNAAT) versus near point-of-care (NPOCs) molecular tests,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-12, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006559
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006559
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.