IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0006422.html

Estimated adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring and its associated factors among African women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Roseline Dzekem Dine
  • Giulia M Muraca
  • Behnam Sadeghirad
  • Rachel Couban
  • Agatha Nyambi
  • Jéssyca Silva
  • Lawrence Mbuagbaw

Abstract

The Dapivirine Vaginal Ring (DVR), a silicone circular ring, continuously distributes Dapivirine into the vagina to prevent HIV infection. We summarized evidence on adherence to DVR for HIV-1 prevention among African women 16–45 years old and described the factors associated with adherence. We searched different databased from inception to December 2024. We included observational studies and randomized trials. Our primary outcome was adherence to DVR, explored as women adhering, mean adherence, and visit/ring adherence. Pairs of reviewers independently screened for eligible studies and extracted relevant data. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions and means for DVR adherence. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Our search retrieved 217 records, of which 15 articles published between 2016 and 2024 were found (seven unique studies). Across the seven included studies, 2,424 women using DVR were reported in four studies. Across the included studies, adherence to the vaginal ring was measured as proportion with good adherence (4 studies), mean adherence (1 study), number of follow-ups with good adherence (1 study); and 1 study reported both mean adherence and number of returned rings deemed adherent. Adherence to the DVR among women was generally good, with a pooled mean estimate of 84% (95% CI: 75%–91%), although the certainty of evidence was very low. The proportion of women who adhered was 76% (95% CI: 63%–87%). Appropriate use of rings was 74% (95% CI 74–75%) and visits with adherence reported was 89% (95% CI 89–90%). Factors influencing adherence were cross-cutting across multiple domains. The evidence suggests generally good adherence to the DVR, which may enhance its effectiveness in reducing HIV infections in real-world settings; however, the certainty of this evidence is low. We encourage further implementation research, particularly individual patient data meta-analyses, to assess adherence more accurately.

Suggested Citation

  • Roseline Dzekem Dine & Giulia M Muraca & Behnam Sadeghirad & Rachel Couban & Agatha Nyambi & Jéssyca Silva & Lawrence Mbuagbaw, 2026. "Estimated adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring and its associated factors among African women: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006422
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006422
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006422&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006422?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.