IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0006412.html

Health worker strikes in Kenya: A symptom of governance inadequacies in a devolved health system

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Tsofa
  • Moriasi Nyanchoka
  • Joshua Munywoki
  • Fatuma Guleid
  • Nancy Kagwanja
  • Lucy Kanya
  • Francis Wafula
  • Jacinta Nzinga

Abstract

Recurrent health worker strikes in Kenya since the 2013 devolution reforms reflect more than episodic labour unrest; they signal broader governance challenges that may be particularly pronounced in decentralised and resource-constrained health systems. Despite constitutional protections for labour rights and decentralised service delivery, Kenya’s health sector has experienced persistent industrial disputes, exposing gaps in legal frameworks, institutional coordination, and dispute resolution systems. We conducted a qualitative policy analysis of health worker strikes in Kenya between 2010 and 2025. Data were drawn from legal statutes, policy documents, government reports, peer-reviewed literature, and grey sources. Guided by Walt and Gilson’s policy triangle, complemented by complex adaptive systems and health governance frameworks, we analysed how institutional arrangements, stakeholder dynamics, and policy processes shape labour relations in a devolved health system. Several interrelated drivers of recurrent strikes were identified, including tensions between the constitutional rights to strike and to health, fragmented governance and weak intergovernmental coordination under devolution, persistent workforce challenges and failures to implement Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) and Return-to-Work Formulae (RTWFs), ineffective dispute-resolution mechanisms, and the absence of enforceable minimum service arrangements during industrial action. Through their interaction, these factors generate recurring cycles of non-compliance, labour unrest, and institutional mistrust. Recurrent disputes over CBA and RTWF implementation suggest that the central issue lies not in the absence of legal protections or negotiated settlements, but in translating commitments into sustained action. Addressing recurrent strikes requires systemic reform beyond short-term dispute settlement to address underlying governance, accountability, and implementation challenges. Priorities include strengthening independent dispute resolution mechanisms, clarifying responsibilities across levels of government, improving accountability for negotiated commitments, harmonising human resource management systems, and institutionalising minimum service protections. Kenya’s experience offers important lessons for decentralised health systems on aligning authority, accountability, and implementation capacity to strengthen resilience and advance universal health coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Tsofa & Moriasi Nyanchoka & Joshua Munywoki & Fatuma Guleid & Nancy Kagwanja & Lucy Kanya & Francis Wafula & Jacinta Nzinga, 2026. "Health worker strikes in Kenya: A symptom of governance inadequacies in a devolved health system," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006412
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006412
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006412&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.