IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0006327.html

Diagnostic test accuracy of teleretinal screening for cytomegalovirus retinitis among people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Holijah Uy
  • Leandrea Nollora
  • Matthew Villanueva
  • John Mark De Leon
  • Nilo D G FlorCruz
  • Albert John Bromeo

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) remains a major cause of preventable blindness among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV), particularly in resource-limited settings where access to ophthalmologists is constrained. Teleretinal screening offers a practical strategy for early detection and timely referral, with the potential to prevent irreversible visual impairment. This review aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of teleretinal screening for CMVR in PLHIV. It was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA diagnostic test accuracy guidelines and was registered prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD420250637110). The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched on March 1, 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivity and specificity values were pooled using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model, and heterogeneity was visually examined using SROC and forest plots. Subgroup analyses were performed according to country income setting, CD4 cell count thresholds, and fundus imaging modality. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. Five studies involving 1,460 eyes of PLHIV were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 87.11% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.35–100%; low-certainty evidence) and a specificity of 97.73% (95% CI: 89.88–100%; high-certainty evidence). Subgroup analyses suggested higher sensitivity among populations with lower CD4 cell count thresholds. Sensitivity analysis showed no significant changes after excluding studies with a high risk of bias. Teleretinal screening for CMVR demonstrates consistently high specificity and potentially useful sensitivity. supporting its role in early detection and referral, particularly among PLHIV with advanced HIV disease. By integrating retinal imaging at the point of care with remote interpretation by ophthalmologists, teleretinal screening can expand access to eye care and reduce diagnostic delays in underserved settings. Nonetheless, further high-quality studies in diverse lower-resource settings are needed to strengthen the evidence base and guide scalable implementation within HIV care systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Holijah Uy & Leandrea Nollora & Matthew Villanueva & John Mark De Leon & Nilo D G FlorCruz & Albert John Bromeo, 2026. "Diagnostic test accuracy of teleretinal screening for cytomegalovirus retinitis among people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006327
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006327
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006327&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.