IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0006282.html

Measuring health financing vulnerability due to reductions in official development assistance: A conceptual framework with empirical application across 47 African countries

Author

Listed:
  • James Avoka Asamani
  • Sophie Faye
  • Kouadjo San Boris Bediakon
  • Hilary Kipruto
  • Sunny C Okoroafor
  • Janet Kayita
  • Ame Dioka
  • Azzam Ali
  • Benson Droti
  • Ogochukwu Chukwujekwu

Abstract

Despite a 33% increase in Official Development Assistance (ODA) from 2019 to 2023, aid declined by 7% in 2024 and projected to further decline in 2025–2027. Health systems in Africa are being impacted by the sudden aid freezes and cuts. There are no multicriteria metrics to estimate the vulnerability of countries to facilitate dialogue and decisions. This paper proposes an approach to assess country’s vulnerability to external aid cuts, considering dynamic health financing and macro-fiscal risk factors. We proposed a framework using four proxy health financing and macro-fiscal factors. Using a polychoric principal component analysis to derive the weight of contribution of each variable, we parameterized the framework with data from existing databases. We applied the framework to assess the health financing vulnerability to external aid cuts/freezes across different countries and explored its validity. Health expenditure per capita in the WHO African Region averaged US$125.2 of which almost 24% depended on external funding. Almost 70% of countries face potential stagnation or contraction in public spending, while 49% of the countries are in debt distress or at high risk of debt distress. The interplay among these factors resulted in the vulnerability of countries averaging almost 60% (range: 23 – 92%), with 27 countries facing “very highly” or “highly” vulnerable health financing situations. Health financing vulnerability explained 31.4% of the variation in UHC attainments and 32.8% of the variation in the number of people pushed further into poverty. We conclude that low spending on health, high donor dependence and unfavourable macro-fiscal conditions, including debt crisis is driving heightened vulnerability across Africa. Countries need to protect essential health services by prioritizing the most vulnerable populations, protect their health budgets through increasing efficiency, generating new revenue through taxes, aligning external aid with national plans and priorities, and better pooling health spending.

Suggested Citation

  • James Avoka Asamani & Sophie Faye & Kouadjo San Boris Bediakon & Hilary Kipruto & Sunny C Okoroafor & Janet Kayita & Ame Dioka & Azzam Ali & Benson Droti & Ogochukwu Chukwujekwu, 2026. "Measuring health financing vulnerability due to reductions in official development assistance: A conceptual framework with empirical application across 47 African countries," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-23, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006282
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006282
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006282&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.