IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0006227.html

Complementing humanitarian staff care with arts-based initiatives? Viewpoints from in-house mental health professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Strohmeier
  • Christiane Ganter-Argast

Abstract

Over the past decade, research on the mental health of humanitarian staff has gained momentum, prompting organizations to increasingly support and invest in workers’ mental health and well-being. However, many of the existing initiatives—such as one-on-one talk therapy—are grounded in Euro-American traditions. These approaches may not align with the cultural frameworks or preferences of all staff, potentially leaving significant segments of the workforce underserved. Furthermore, challenges related to team cohesion are difficult to address within current staff care structures. Against this backdrop, arts-based initiatives (ABIs) may present a promising complementary approach but remain largely overlooked in humanitarian staff care practice and research. This qualitative study explores the viewpoints of eight in-house mental health professionals (MHPs) currently or previously working for humanitarian and development organisations—a key but hard-to-reach study population—on complementing existing staff care services with ABIs, such as music-making, visual arts, and dance. Data generated through semi-structured online and in-person interviews were analysed using thematic analysis to examine perspectives regarding potential benefits, design considerations, and anticipated challenges related to implementing ABIs in humanitarian workplaces. Three themes reflecting MHPs’ perspectives emerged from the analysis. Overall, MHPs supported introducing ABIs as complementary services. They emphasized what they perceived as the unique potential of these initiatives to enhance well-being, bridge cultural divides, and foster a sense of community, ultimately contributing to a more positive work environment. However, MHPs also underscored the importance of tailoring ABIs to the specific contexts in which they are implemented, requiring carefully designed interventions to prevent unintended negative outcomes. Amongst others, they identified accessibility and buy-in from senior management as key factors for a successful and sustainable rollout. Further research is needed to systematically explore staff preferences, participation factors, integration models, as well as, at a later stage, the effectiveness of ABIs for this occupational group.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Strohmeier & Christiane Ganter-Argast, 2026. "Complementing humanitarian staff care with arts-based initiatives? Viewpoints from in-house mental health professionals," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006227
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006227
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006227&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.