IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0006059.html

Prospective economic evaluation of a predictive artificial intelligence model for sepsis: Effects on hospital costs and return on investment

Author

Listed:
  • Andres Giglio
  • Eric Macias-Fassio
  • Santiago Salas-Sosa
  • David Lopez
  • Cristina Pruenza
  • Aythami Morales
  • Marcio Borges-Sa

Abstract

Early sepsis detection is essential for improving outcomes and reducing costs, but traditional rule-based systems have limited accuracy and real-world evidence for machine-learning alternatives remains scarce. In this context, BIAlert-Sepsis predicts sepsis risk within 24 hours using historical hospital data, and evaluating its implementation in a tertiary hospital setting provides an opportunity to quantify its clinical benefits and economic value. We conducted a retrospective quasi-experimental before–after study including all septic patients admitted from January 2011 to June 2024. The baseline period (Jan 2011 – Mar 2019) was compared with the AI implementation period (Apr 2019 – June 2024), excluding the COVID-19 interval. Outcomes were assessed using adjusted generalized linear models and interrupted time series regression. A hospital-perspective economic evaluation incorporated implementation and maintenance costs, and a 5-year model estimated net benefit and return on investment (ROI), supported by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A total of 8,039 patients were included (6,168 baseline period; 1,871 AI period). Demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable across periods. During the AI period, ICU admissions decreased from 34.4% to 30.4% (adjusted p = 0.001), accompanied by significant reductions of 0.35 ICU days and 0.59 ward days per patient. Mean admission costs declined from 26,517€ to 24,630€ (adjusted p = 0.005). After covariate adjustment, AI implementation was associated with a 26.1–31.1% reduction in mean admission costs across GLM models. Interrupted time series analysis identified a modest immediate cost level change after AI implementation and a larger sustained decline during the post-COVID period. The 5-year economic model projected a cumulative discounted net benefit of 3.55M€ and a 528% ROI. BIAlert-Sepsis was associated with favourable clinical outcomes and lower costs, with economic modelling suggesting early breakeven and positive financial returns.Author summary: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition in which early detection is critical to improving survival and reducing healthcare costs. However, traditional rule-based screening systems often fail to identify high-risk patients early enough. AI offers a promising way to support earlier and more accurate detection.

Suggested Citation

  • Andres Giglio & Eric Macias-Fassio & Santiago Salas-Sosa & David Lopez & Cristina Pruenza & Aythami Morales & Marcio Borges-Sa, 2026. "Prospective economic evaluation of a predictive artificial intelligence model for sepsis: Effects on hospital costs and return on investment," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006059
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006059&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.