IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0006046.html

An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative study and modified Delphi approach

Author

Listed:
  • Beryne Odeny
  • Dorothy Mangale
  • Dhananjaya Sharma
  • Mariam Balogun
  • Elizabeth Bukusi
  • Fatima Suleman
  • Miliard Derbew
  • Juliet Iwelunmor
  • Ermyas Birru
  • Isaac Che Ngang
  • Akila Anandarajah
  • Vaishnavi Mamillapalle
  • Wael Almahmeed

Abstract

Contributions from healthcare professionals in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to global health research remain disproportionately low. We conceptualized the TIMER-2C framework to capture the multi-level barriers and facilitators shaping research productivity among local healthcare professionals in MENA and SSA. We conducted qualitative interviews using a modified Delphi approach comprising two rounds to: 1) identify barriers and facilitators, and 2) establish consensus on the most prominent factors influencing research productivity. We purposively sampled 17 participants from Jordan, Qatar, Egypt, Lebanon, North Sudan, South Sudan, Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia, South Africa and India. Interview guides were grounded in theoretical frameworks. Transcripts were analyzed for barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for increasing research output. Barriers and facilitators to research productivity occurred at individual, institutional, national, and global levels. Key barriers included limited time, funding, mentorship, and research training; institutional prioritization of clinical and teaching duties over research; lack of national investment and supportive policies; and global challenges in funding, publishing, and collaboration. Facilitators included personal motivation, protected time, access to training and mentorship, institutional support for research, national funding strategies, and meaningful global partnerships that value local contributions. We identified six themes and one overarching theme from which we coined the TIMER-2C framework: 1) Time, 2) Instability, Interest & Infrastructure, 3) Money & Resources, 4) Expertise & Experience, 5) Recognition, and 6) constructive Collaboration, together fostering a positive research Culture (2C). Research culture emerged as an overarching influence on research contributions. We unveil an emerging framework, the TIMER-2C, that depicts relationships among multilevel factors shaping research productivity and offers a useful tool to guide and evaluate local capacity-building strategies. We recommend further application of this framework to guide the design, implementation and evaluation of multi-pronged strategies to enhance research contributions from MENA, SSA, and similar contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Beryne Odeny & Dorothy Mangale & Dhananjaya Sharma & Mariam Balogun & Elizabeth Bukusi & Fatima Suleman & Miliard Derbew & Juliet Iwelunmor & Ermyas Birru & Isaac Che Ngang & Akila Anandarajah & Vaish, 2026. "An emerging TIMER-2C framework for addressing barriers to research culture and productivity among local healthcare providers in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative study and modified Delphi approach," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006046
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006046
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0006046&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.