Author
Listed:
- Teresa P Cotrim
- Pedro Bem-Haja
- Paula Vagos
- Isabel Silva
- Rui Azevedo
- Cláudia Fernandes
- Samuel Antunes
- Joaquim S Pinto
- Elisabeth Brito
- Isabel Souto
- Iara Teixeira
- Carlos F Silva
- Anabela Pereira
Abstract
The prevalence and impact of exposure to psychosocial risk factors seems to be increasing in labour contexts in general. The assessment and measurement of psychosocial work factors is essential for the improvement of healthy workplaces and should be incorporated into health and safety management programmes. The assessment of psychosocial factors requires the selection of appropriate instruments that respond to the multidimensionality of that construct. The COPSOQ III covers a multitude of theoretical approaches and provides comprehensive information on psychosocial working conditions that may help to deduce actions for their improvement. The use of COPSOQ III in national context needs prior validation studies. In this regard, the paper aims to assess the psychometric properties of the middle version of COPSOQ III as to provide evidence on the validity of this instrument to be used for the Portuguese working population. The validation process comprised a national sample of 7,506 participants that included different occupational sectors based on a cross-sectional study. Construct validity was assessed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the internal consistency of the scales was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. The results revealed a satisfactory reliability and ability of the Portuguese middle version of COPSOQ III (COPSOQ III-PT) to discriminate the psychosocial dimensions. The distribution of the scores of the study sample by each scale and by sex enables a better interpretation of the results based on reference values.
Suggested Citation
Teresa P Cotrim & Pedro Bem-Haja & Paula Vagos & Isabel Silva & Rui Azevedo & Cláudia Fernandes & Samuel Antunes & Joaquim S Pinto & Elisabeth Brito & Isabel Souto & Iara Teixeira & Carlos F Silva & A, 2026.
"Validation of the third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire for Portugal,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-17, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006036
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0006036
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0006036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.