IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005936.html

Evaluation of a diabetes decentralization program in rural Madagascar using the RE-AIM framework

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy Mugisha
  • Fanjalalaina Rasoanaivo
  • Mbolatiana Raza-Fanomezanjanahary
  • Fiainamirindra Anjaratiana Ralaivavikoa
  • Tanjaka Andriamanampy
  • Giovanna Cowley
  • Haja Ramamonjisoa
  • Claude Rakotonirina
  • Tojosoa Rajaonarison
  • Judith Rahanitriniaina
  • Mamy Andrianomenjanahary
  • Lalaina Narovananahary Rakotovoavy
  • Laura Davis
  • Bénédicte Razafinjato
  • Rado JL Rakotonanahary
  • Karen E Finnegan

Abstract

Diabetes is a significant cause of disabilities and deaths in Africa. In Madagascar, diabetes causes an estimated 5,000 deaths yearly. There are many barriers to diabetes care in Madagascar, and a key barrier is health systems readiness to provide care, especially in rural areas. To mitigate this, the non-governmental organization (NGO) Pivot and the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) jointly implemented a diabetes decentralization program in Ifanadiana, a rural district of Madagascar. This program included advocacy; mass screening; training of healthcare workers (HCWs); procurement of equipment, medications and consumables; establishment of a dedicated diabetes care day at primary health centers (PHCs); and support groups for patients. This study evaluated the implementation of this multifaceted diabetes program using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Using a mixed methods study design, we evaluated program implementation at PHCs at 3, 6, and 18 months of implementation. Overall, 2.1% of people tested during mass screenings were positive for diabetes and 59.3% of people diagnosed with diabetes during mass screenings entered into care at a PHC. There was a fasting blood glucose check at 93.2% of visits, and an average 1.35 days of medication stock out per month. 48.0% patients had their diabetes controlled, ranging from 33.3% at the PHCs with 3 months of implementation to 57.8% at 18 months of implementation. Qualitative data revealed that HCWs adopted various aspects of the program, with suggestions for improvement on the training received. A dedicated day for diabetes management weekly was widely accepted by patients and HCWs. The most difficult aspect of diabetes management for patients was dietary recommendations. This study demonstrated that NGO support enables accessibility of diabetes services even in the most remote areas, and a multi-layered approach to implementation of diabetes diagnosis and treatment is needed for effective care.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy Mugisha & Fanjalalaina Rasoanaivo & Mbolatiana Raza-Fanomezanjanahary & Fiainamirindra Anjaratiana Ralaivavikoa & Tanjaka Andriamanampy & Giovanna Cowley & Haja Ramamonjisoa & Claude Rakotonirin, 2026. "Evaluation of a diabetes decentralization program in rural Madagascar using the RE-AIM framework," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005936
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005936&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.