IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005928.html

Evaluation of surveillance performance and determinants for priority vaccine-preventable diseases in Niger State, Nigeria: A CDC 2001 Guideline-based multilevel analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Oladayo David Awoyale
  • Akolade Jimoh
  • Anne Dede
  • Rauf Ibrahim Rauf
  • Arab Mustafa
  • Tosin Ayokunmi Sowade
  • Patrick B Gimba
  • Idris Ibrahim
  • Catherine Nabiem Akpen
  • Eugene Chidi Eugene
  • Grace Fubara Erekosima
  • Chibuike Okekeigwe
  • Moses Job Tarfa
  • Saheed D Isiaka
  • Hilary Okagbue
  • Sunday Atobatele
  • Sidney Sampson

Abstract

Vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, and evidence on subnational surveillance performance in Nigeria remains limited. We conducted a cross-sectional analytic evaluation of surveillance systems for measles, diphtheria, acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), and cerebrospinal meningitis (CSM) in Niger State, Nigeria. Data were collected from 415 clinicians, community resource persons, and surveillance focal persons across 12 purposively selected Local Government Areas using structured questionnaires adapted from CDC surveillance evaluation guidelines and aligned with IDSR guidance. Surveillance performance was assessed using sensitivity, data quality, and stability. Analyses included descriptive statistics, bivariate tests, and multivariable regression models. Reported suspected case detection was higher for measles and AFP than for CSM and diphtheria, with detection reported by 94.2% and 93.0% of respondents for measles and AFP, respectively, compared with 84.3% for CSM and 81.4% for diphtheria. Transport availability without delays was consistently associated with lower odds of surveillance failure across disease-specific models, including measles sample collection (aOR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05–0.28) and case confirmation (aOR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02–0.21), diphtheria sample collection (aOR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06–0.49) and confirmation (aOR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.08–0.58), and CSM sample collection (aOR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06–0.54) and confirmation (aOR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07–0.61). Active guideline use was associated with AFP sample collection (aOR = 4.12, 95% CI: 1.72–9.87). Only 66.5% of respondents reported fully accurate submitted forms, and financial support was associated with lower odds of instability (aOR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56–0.97). Strengthening transport, infrastructure, financing, and data quality systems may improve VPD surveillance performance and outbreak preparedness in similar settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Oladayo David Awoyale & Akolade Jimoh & Anne Dede & Rauf Ibrahim Rauf & Arab Mustafa & Tosin Ayokunmi Sowade & Patrick B Gimba & Idris Ibrahim & Catherine Nabiem Akpen & Eugene Chidi Eugene & Grace Fu, 2026. "Evaluation of surveillance performance and determinants for priority vaccine-preventable diseases in Niger State, Nigeria: A CDC 2001 Guideline-based multilevel analysis," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-31, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005928
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005928
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005928&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.