IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005914.html

A deep dive into Brazilian health technology assessment: Structure, policies, and processes

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Alkhaldi
  • Márcia Matos
  • Ali Sweid
  • Aisha Al Basuoni
  • Rima Kachach
  • Maya Hassan
  • Patience Mushamiri-Kuzviwanza
  • Line Enjalbert
  • Sara Ahmed

Abstract

Healthcare systems worldwide face mounting pressures from aging populations, costly medical technologies, and rising healthcare expenditures. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has emerged as a critical tool for improving efficiency and supporting evidence-informed resource allocation through systematic evaluation. In Brazil, HTA plays a central role in advancing Universal Health Coverage (UHC), particularly through the National Committee for Health Technology Incorporation (Comissão Nacional de Incorporação de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde – CONITEC). As HTA continues to evolve in Brazil, there is an increasing need for health policy and systems research to better understand its structure, challenges, and opportunities. This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the key pillars of Brazil’s national HTA system, identify existing barriers, and propose strategies to strengthen HTA processes. A mixed-methods approach was employed between 2021 and 2023, targeting HTA-related organizations and experts across multiple health sectors. Data were collected through thirteen electronic institutional surveys assessing technical aspects of HTA and nine virtual in-depth interviews exploring HTA from a policy perspective. Findings indicate a strong presence of public-sector and academic institutions within Brazil’s HTA landscape, alongside broad recognition of HTA’s value and CONITEC’s central role in coordinating evidence generation and appraisal. However, challenges such as potential conflicts of interest and reliance on exclusive government funding were identified, underscoring the need for more diversified and sustainable financing mechanisms. The system benefits from a multidisciplinary workforce and active community participation, and HTA evidence is widely used in policymaking, particularly in evaluating clinical effectiveness, costs, and economic value. Despite these strengths, limitations persist, including insufficient institutional capacity, resource constraints, and political support. Participants emphasized the need to strengthen HTA skills, competencies, and coordination to improve the effectiveness and impact of HTA processes. This study contributes to the limited literature on Brazil’s HTA system and provides evidence to inform future research and policy efforts aimed at strengthening HTA integration in support of UHC.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Alkhaldi & Márcia Matos & Ali Sweid & Aisha Al Basuoni & Rima Kachach & Maya Hassan & Patience Mushamiri-Kuzviwanza & Line Enjalbert & Sara Ahmed, 2026. "A deep dive into Brazilian health technology assessment: Structure, policies, and processes," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005914
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005914
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005914&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Marino & Luca Lorenzoni, 2019. "The impact of technological advancements on health spending: A literature review," OECD Health Working Papers 113, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Younhee Kim & Kyung-sook Woo, 2025. "The bill of aging: fiscal projections of demographic changes on South Korea’s national health insurance, 2023–2042," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Andres R. Schneeberger & Sarah Werthmueller & Santiago Barco & Sabina C. Heuss, 2023. "Patients' preference regarding inpatient versus outpatient setting ‐ A systematic review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1409-1419, September.
    3. Nor Aziah Abd Kadir & Nur Fakhzan Marwan & Adibah Hussin & Rosmah Nizam & Fazreena Mansor, 2022. "Long Run Analysis between Climate Change, Socio-Economic Factors and Technology on Health Expenditure in Malaysia," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 6589-6589, December.
    4. Palomera, David & Starke, Peter, 2026. "Is GDP growth necessary to maintain pensions? An empirical analysis of public pension spending and benefits in the OECD," Working Paper Series 01/2026, Post-Growth Economics Network (PEN).
    5. Colombier, Carsten & Braendle, Thomas, 2022. "Healthcare expenditure projections up to 2050: ageing and the COVID-19 crisis," MPRA Paper 120659, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Brändle, Thomas & Colombier, Carsten & Lerch, Benjamin, 2025. "Determinants of Healthcare Expenditure: Evidence from Switzerland between 1960-2022," Working papers 2025/06, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.