IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005730.html

The catastrophic financial burden of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and asset index-based inequality analysis: A prospective cohort study analysing patients’ impoverishment

Author

Listed:
  • Shoaib Hassan
  • Mala Kanthali
  • Manju Raj Purohit
  • Tehmina Mustafa

Abstract

This prospective cohort study assessed the financial burden of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in India, revealing substantial costs across disease manifestations. Among 200 confirmed EPTB patients, those with pleuritis, meningitis, and other severe forms, incurred significantly higher out-of-pocket (OOP) and indirect costs than lymphadenitis patients. Over 90% of meningitis and 80% of pleuritis patients experienced catastrophic health expenditures (CHE), defined as costs exceeding 20% of annual income. Up to 42% of patients were pushed below the poverty line. Asset-based inequality analysis showed that lower socioeconomic groups faced a disproportionate cost burden. The cost of diagnostic tests and the less severe nature of EPTB lymphadenitis may delay seeking care until patients’ ability to work is affected. Factors such as low income, comorbidities, diagnostic delays, and reduced working capacity were associated with CHE. Notably, presumptive non-TB patients also incurred significant OOP and productivity losses during their diagnostic journeys, despite ultimately receiving non-TB diagnoses. These findings highlight the need for universal health coverage and enhanced financial protection strategies to mitigate the economic impact of EPTB and similar chronic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Shoaib Hassan & Mala Kanthali & Manju Raj Purohit & Tehmina Mustafa, 2026. "The catastrophic financial burden of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and asset index-based inequality analysis: A prospective cohort study analysing patients’ impoverishment," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005730
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005730
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005730&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.