Author
Listed:
- Henry Sambakunsi
- MacWellings Phiri
- Thomasena O’Byrne
- John Mankhomwa
- Raymond Pongolani
- Jo Zaremba
- Nicholas A Feasey
- Eleanor Macpherson
- Deborah Nyirenda
Abstract
Inappropriate antibiotics use due to low public knowledge and awareness contributes to the growing Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of Responsive Dialogues (RDs) is to engage communities and key stakeholders to share information, galvanize action and create local solutions to reduce the burden of AMR. RDs promote collaborative problem-solving and have been identified as a potential tool for engaging diverse stakeholders in addressing AMR. However, RDs were only recently developed, and empirical evidence about their utility and feasibility in LMICs is currently limited. We piloted RDs with poultry farmers, government and private pharmacists or prescribers, and male caregivers in Malawi. Using 13 semi-structured interviews and three focus groups, we assessed feasibility of this participatory approach to influence inclusive local AMR policies and solutions. The participatory nature of RDs promoted inclusive decision-making and facilitated participants’ capacity to co-create locally relevant AMR solutions. Information shared during RDs improved AMR awareness, prompting participants to recognize and reconsider antibiotic practices and co-create solutions including community education on responsible use, local stewardship committees, and integrating AMR education into existing health programs. Implementation barriers varied: farmers and private prescribers expressed concerns about economic losses from reduced antibiotic use, while male caregivers reported difficulties educating others without tangible resources. Considerations for AMR-RDs scale-up include resource allocation, integration with existing health systems, and further research on long-term impact across different low resource settings. Despite these challenges, this pilot demonstrates that RDs offer a valuable participatory approach for co-creating contextually relevant AMR solutions in resource-limited settings. Sustained impact requires addressing structural barriers, establishing feedback mechanisms, and integrating RDs outputs within existing health system structures and national AMR action plans.
Suggested Citation
Henry Sambakunsi & MacWellings Phiri & Thomasena O’Byrne & John Mankhomwa & Raymond Pongolani & Jo Zaremba & Nicholas A Feasey & Eleanor Macpherson & Deborah Nyirenda, 2026.
"Co-creating community-driven solutions and policy priorities to address antimicrobial resistance through Responsive Dialogues: A qualitative evaluation from Malawi,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005697
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005697
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.