IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005646.html

A qualitative evaluation of a global surgery course within the University of Cape Town’s master of public health curriculum: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Yvan Zolo
  • Wakisa Mulwafu
  • Moses Isiagi
  • Mary Kinney
  • Simon Le Roux
  • Salome Maswime

Abstract

Access to safe surgery is a critical, yet often neglected, component of Public Health for health systems strengthening. Despite its importance, Global Surgery education remains absent from Public Health curricula, which may lead Public Health specialists unprepared to address the unmet global burden of surgical disease. This study evaluated a novel Fundamentals in Global Surgery course within the University of Cape Town’s Master of Public Health (MPH) program, an initiative designed to bridge this educational gap. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using in-depth structured interviews with ten program alumni (2022–2025). Data were analyzed thematically to explore the course’s impact on participants’ knowledge, careers, and professional identity. Analysis revealed five central themes defined by the following key insights: 1) a notable paradigm shift from viewing surgery as a clinical discipline to understanding it as a Public Health imperative; 2) the critical role of a multidisciplinary learning environment in mirroring real-world health systems; 3) the effectiveness of applied pedagogical approaches like case-based learning and intervention design; 4) a significant professional impact, including direct career pivots, advancements, and the cultivation of a practitioner-advocate mindset; and 5) logistical challenges of balancing coursework with professional duties. UCT’s Fundamentals in Global Surgery course for MPH students demonstrates an effective model for integrating Global Surgery into Public Health education. By combining a systems-focused curriculum, an improvement science approach, and a multidisciplinary cohort, the course shows potentials to transform students into practice-ready change agents. The findings of this study inform a blueprint for curriculum development and strengthen the call to integrate Global Surgery into Public Health training.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvan Zolo & Wakisa Mulwafu & Moses Isiagi & Mary Kinney & Simon Le Roux & Salome Maswime, 2025. "A qualitative evaluation of a global surgery course within the University of Cape Town’s master of public health curriculum: A cross-sectional study," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005646
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005646
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005646&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brittany A. Hout & Eric P. Matthews & Jan-Michael Van Gent, 2020. "Global Surgery: The Perspective of Public Health Students," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 1-1, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.