IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 diagnosis within five days of symptoms onset among healthcare workers in Malawi; Non-randomized control trial of self-testing using Ag-RDTs

Author

Listed:
  • Chimwemwe Kwanjo Banda
  • Wezzie S Lora
  • Lucky G Ngwira
  • Yasmin Dunkley
  • Emily Nightingale
  • Hendricks Mwenelupembe
  • Richard Chilongosi
  • Gabrielle Bonnet
  • Nicola Desmond
  • Elizabeth L Corbett
  • Karin Hatzhold
  • Augustine T Choko

Abstract

Efficient and sustainable models of Corona Virus Disease of 2019 (COVID‑19) screening among healthcare workers (HCWs) such as self-testing are essential for averting transmission within and outside health care facilities. We compared the number of confirmed early COVID‑19 positive diagnoses (defined as COVID‑19 cases diagnosed within five days of symptoms onset) among HCW in self-testing arm using Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Test kits (Ag-RDT) and standard of care arm (SOC) who were offered COVID‑19 testing if they presented at the clinic with any COVID‑19 symptoms. Twelve primary healthcare facilities in Blantyre, Malawi, were purposively allocated (1:1) aiming for geographical and size balance in a 2-arm non-randomised cluster trial (ISRCTN: 17596113), available from https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17596113. Arm-1 was SOC and Arm-2 was COVID 19 self-testing (C19ST). HCWs in the C19ST arm had twice-weekly COVID‑19 Ag-RDT self-testing. The primary outcome compared by arm the harmonic mean number of early COVID‑19 positive diagnoses among HCWs. Analysis was by intention-to-treat using cluster-level summaries and t-test, with adjustment for imbalance. Participation was 99.8% among eligible HCWs across all facilities (1081/1083). Of the 1081 participating, 612 (56.6%) and 469 (43.4%) were in SOC and C19ST arm, respectively. Mean age was 35.5y (sd: 9.3); 183/612 (29.9%) in SOC were male, compared to 166/469 (35.3%) in C19ST; overall prior vaccination was 80.0% with no difference between SOC, (81.5%) and C19ST (78.0%). Follow-up at exit (12 weeks) was high (SOC: [94%]; C19ST: [87.6%]) and a harmonic mean of 1 and 4 HCWs had early COVID‑19 diagnosis in SOC and C19ST arms, respectively. COVID‑19 self-testing using Ag-RDTs provided a safe, quick, and reliable model for identifying early-onset symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID‑19 positive HCW. Self-testing was feasible to integrate for routine screening among HCW potentially reducing disruption to health services. This model has potential for wide scale up programmatically especially in resource-constrained settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Chimwemwe Kwanjo Banda & Wezzie S Lora & Lucky G Ngwira & Yasmin Dunkley & Emily Nightingale & Hendricks Mwenelupembe & Richard Chilongosi & Gabrielle Bonnet & Nicola Desmond & Elizabeth L Corbett & K, 2025. "COVID-19 diagnosis within five days of symptoms onset among healthcare workers in Malawi; Non-randomized control trial of self-testing using Ag-RDTs," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005604
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005604
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005604&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.