IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005581.html

Enablers and barriers to implementing a digital logistics system: A qualitative evaluation of OpenLMIS for Nigeria’s vaccine supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Ifeoluwa Adebola Noiki
  • Lola Aladesanmi
  • Suruchi Gupta
  • Patricia Mechael
  • Erica Layer
  • Smisha Agarwal
  • Dustin Gibson

Abstract

Logistics management information systems (LMIS) strengthen health commodity distribution and decision-making. Nigeria introduced OpenLMIS, an electronic LMIS, in August 2021 to track COVID-19 vaccines, and a routine immunisation (RI) module was deployed nationwide in 2023. This evaluation examined enablers and barriers to effective implementation and sustained use. A qualitative design combined desk reviews of LMIS documents, 42 key informants interviews, and 16 structured observational assessments with Cold Chain Officers. Data collection occurred in three states, the Federal Capital Territory, Lagos, and Niger, and nine Local Government Areas (LGA; three per state), which were purposively selected to capture diverse operational contexts. OpenLMIS has been rolled out across all 835 Nigerian cold stores at the zonal, state, and LGA levels. Adoption was driven by strong government stewardship (through policy prioritisation, allocation of personnel, and facilitation of site access), particularly the National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA), and consistent financial and technical support from partners, including Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), and UNICEF. Persisting challenges include high staff turnover disrupting continuity; limited user training, often online-only, and insufficient where connectivity is poor; unreliable power and internet are hindering timely data entry and access; and inadequate, unsustained funding for data bundles, which shifts costs to users and undermines utilisation and data quality. OpenLMIS is advancing digitisation and visibility of Nigeria’s immunisation supply chain for informed decision-making. However, qualitative evidence from national stakeholders and the 3 sampled, states indicate that to maximise its benefits, stakeholders should address individual-level disincentives (e.g., turnover, training gaps), invest in reliable power and connectivity, and ensure sustainable financing for data and system operations alongside continued improvement in functionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Ifeoluwa Adebola Noiki & Lola Aladesanmi & Suruchi Gupta & Patricia Mechael & Erica Layer & Smisha Agarwal & Dustin Gibson, 2026. "Enablers and barriers to implementing a digital logistics system: A qualitative evaluation of OpenLMIS for Nigeria’s vaccine supply chain," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005581
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005581
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005581&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.