IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005537.html

How can new TB vaccines be effectively introduced in Indonesia? Insights from diverse stakeholders

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Dwi Putri
  • Ahmad Fuady
  • Nugroho Soeharno
  • Aqila Sakina Zafira
  • Margareta Sirena Valeria
  • Pratama Wicaksana
  • Poppy Yuniar
  • Mardiati Nadjib
  • Azhiim Yudha
  • Katherine A Thomas
  • Rebecca A Clark
  • Sri Rezeki Hadinegoro
  • Richard G White

Abstract

New adult tuberculosis (TB) vaccines are in clinical trials and may be licensed as soon as 2028. However, vaccine rollout requires addressing multiple contextual factors beyond clinical trial findings. This study explored stakeholders’ perspectives on the introduction of a new TB vaccine in Indonesia. We used a mixed-methods approach combining a stakeholder consultation in Jakarta (13/03/2025) among 28 participants with diverse expertise and follow-up interviews with two of those participants. Participants completed a structured questionnaire (via Slido) consisting of closed- and open-ended questions, adapted into Bahasa. Questions explored factors to be considered regarding vaccine introduction, target populations, delivery strategies, regulatory considerations, and lessons from other vaccine programs. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative responses underwent thematic analysis. All participants agreed on the importance of TB vaccine introduction. Key concerns were minimum efficacy of 50% and comparative effectiveness against other interventions, such as TB preventive treatment. Most agreed that vaccine introduction should not depend on local manufacturing capacity, administration route, or dosage. Critical enablers identified were adequate funding, strong political commitment, and demand generation through public acceptance. Priority target populations included people living with HIV/AIDS, individuals with diabetes, household contacts of TB patients, adolescents, and healthcare workers. Major challenges highlighted were vaccine hesitancy, halal issues, misinformation, and limited healthcare worker knowledge. Opinions diverged regarding the feasibility of vaccine rollout without Interferon-Gamma Release Assay (IGRA) testing: nine opposed vaccinating those with IGRA-negative status, six abstained, and three argued that IGRA-testing was unnecessary and cost-inefficient due to its high price. Regulatory and budgeting processes were cited as additional barriers. Introducing new TB vaccines in Indonesia will be complex and concerns extend beyond efficacy. Its success will depend on coordinated strategies to define target populations, design tailored delivery approaches, address vaccine hesitancy, and navigate regulatory and financing challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Dwi Putri & Ahmad Fuady & Nugroho Soeharno & Aqila Sakina Zafira & Margareta Sirena Valeria & Pratama Wicaksana & Poppy Yuniar & Mardiati Nadjib & Azhiim Yudha & Katherine A Thomas & Rebecca A Cl, 2026. "How can new TB vaccines be effectively introduced in Indonesia? Insights from diverse stakeholders," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005537
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005537
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005537&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.