IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The shadow of violence: How intimate partner violence shapes contraceptive and maternal health service use across 25 African countries

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Bawuah
  • Linus Baatiema
  • Michael Sarfo
  • Francis Appiah
  • Sanni Yaya

Abstract

Despite increasing efforts to improve reproductive health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), disparities persist in the use of modern contraceptives and maternal health services (MHS). Evidence suggests that exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) may influence women’s health-seeking behaviours, yet few studies have examined this relationship across multiple SSA countries. Using cross-sectional data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (2015–2024) in 25 SSA countries, we analyzed 122,144 women aged 15–49 with complete information on IPV, contraceptive use, and MHS utilization. The primary outcome variables were current use of any modern contraceptive method and adequate MHS use. IPV exposure was measured using standardized DHS indicators for emotional, physical, and sexual violence. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for socio-demographic covariates and survey design were used to examine associations. Overall, 29.2% of women used modern contraceptives, and 39.2% received adequate MHS. About 34.3% of women had experienced at least one form of IPV. Women who experienced emotional (AOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.11–1.20), physical (AOR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.07–1.20), or sexual violence (AOR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.03–1.15) were significantly more likely to use modern contraceptives than those who had not. However, they were less likely to receive adequate MHS: emotional (AOR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.91–0.99), sexual (AOR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.83–0.95), and at least one form of IPV (AOR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90–0.98). Key predictors such as parity, education, household wealth, residence, distance to a health facility, employment, and media exposure significantly influenced the outcomes. While exposure to IPV may increase contraceptive use, possibly as a protective strategy, it simultaneously reduces uptake of comprehensive maternal healthcare. Integrating IPV screening, counselling, and support services into reproductive and maternal health programs is critical for improving women’s health outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Bawuah & Linus Baatiema & Michael Sarfo & Francis Appiah & Sanni Yaya, 2025. "The shadow of violence: How intimate partner violence shapes contraceptive and maternal health service use across 25 African countries," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005470
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005470
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005470&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Gyan Aboagye & Bright Opoku Ahinkorah & Charles Lwanga Tengan & Iddrisu Salifu & Henry Yaw Acheampong & Abdul-Aziz Seidu, 2022. "Partner alcohol consumption and intimate partner violence against women in sexual unions in sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Caroline Adjimi Nyemgah & Meghna Ranganathan & Doreen Nabukalu & Heidi Stöckl, 2024. "Prevalence and severity of physical intimate partner violence during pregnancy among adolescents in eight sub-Saharan Africa countries: A cross-sectional study," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(7), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.