IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contraceptive discontinuation, switching, abandonment and their reproductive consequences: An analysis of 1,539,071 episodes of reversible method use contributed from 61 countries that participated in DHS: Population base-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed M Ali
  • John Cleland

Abstract

As contraceptive uptake rises in a country, discontinuation of use of a contraceptive method because of dissatisfaction and the ability and willingness to switch promptly to an alternative following such discontinuation become increasingly important determinants of the prevention of unintended pregnancy. About one third of unintended births in low- and middle-income countries are the result of discontinuation or accidental pregnancy while using a method. Examination of the dynamics of contraceptive use continuation and switching can reveal how well contraceptive services are meeting the family planning needs of women and couples. We performed a population-based analysis of 1,539,071 episodes of use of reversible contraceptive methods from calendar data collected in 149 demographic and health surveys in 61 countries. Cause-specific discontinuation rates in the presence of competing events, switching to an alternative method within three months of discontinuation, and conception rates after cause-specific discontinuation, were computed using the cumulative incidence method. Competing risks marginal models were used to produce sub-hazard ratios of discontinuation, switching and abandonment. Meta-analysis was used to estimate the method-specific pooled cumulative incidence rates for discontinuation, switching and abandonment. We found that discontinuation because of dissatisfaction was highest in socio-economically developed countries with low unmet need for contraception. Conversely, switching within three months of discontinuation was much higher in these countries, with the net result that contraceptive abandonment, defined as discontinuation but no switching, was 31% lower in most developed societies than in the least developed. Women who switched were five times less likely to experience pregnancy within 12 months than abandoners. In conclusion, high discontinuation rates should be regarded as an unfortunate inevitability, which may be resistant to improvements in the quality of services. Increases in the ability and willingness to switch is a more plausible pathway to the reduction of unintended pregnancy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed M Ali & John Cleland, 2025. "Contraceptive discontinuation, switching, abandonment and their reproductive consequences: An analysis of 1,539,071 episodes of reversible method use contributed from 61 countries that participated in," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005174
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005174
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005174&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.