IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005162.html

Examining epidemiological models and economic analyses of typhoid conjugate vaccine: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Prashant Mandaliya
  • Stacey Orangi
  • Jacob Kazungu
  • Dennis Waithaka
  • Angela Kairu
  • Amos Bationo
  • Felix Masiye
  • Obinna Onwujekwe
  • Edwine Barasa

Abstract

Typhoid remains a public health concern across many low- and middle-income countries. This scoping review summarized and mapped evidence from epidemiological models and economic analyses of typhoid conjugate vaccine (TCV). We included studies on the cost of illness of typhoid, the cost of vaccination, cost-effectiveness, and public health impact of TCV. A search was conducted across five databases and followed the Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework. We extracted data on the study design, population, outcomes, model parameters, and cost-effectiveness. All reported costs were converted to 2024 United States Dollars (USD) to allow for comparisons across studies. Findings were summarized by key outcomes. The 26 studies included in the review covered Sub-Saharan Africa, South and East Asia, the Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Europe. A total of ten studies reported the cost of treating a typhoid patient, with costs varying based on the hospital setting, geographic location and severity of the disease. Five studies examined the cost of TCV vaccination and delivery reported higher costs for campaigns than routine immunization, with economic costs consistently higher than financial costs. The two public health impact studies predicted case reductions from 2% to 94% and mortality reductions up to 36% or 100%, depending on the vaccine strategy employed. The nine economic evaluations included in the review reported lower incremental cost effectiveness ratios in high-incidence urban settings, with some strategies termed as cost-saving. Cost-effectiveness depends on incidence, perspective, and vaccine strategy, emphasizing the need for context-specific evaluations. Literature shows that the value of TCV is influenced by the disease burden, vaccination costs, and health outcomes, which are context specific. Future research should employ more comprehensive models to better capture TCV’s economic and public health value and leverage on local data to give more contextual evidence for policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Prashant Mandaliya & Stacey Orangi & Jacob Kazungu & Dennis Waithaka & Angela Kairu & Amos Bationo & Felix Masiye & Obinna Onwujekwe & Edwine Barasa, 2026. "Examining epidemiological models and economic analyses of typhoid conjugate vaccine: A scoping review," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-33, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005162
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005162
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005162&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.