IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seroprevalence of spotted fever rickettsiosis and ehrlichiosis among food processing workers and their families in Latino communities in North Carolina

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa K Cutshaw
  • Michael Sciaudone
  • Brenda Vasquez-Martinez
  • Colleen M McClean
  • Oksana Kharabora
  • Katherine Murray
  • Stephen Strohminger
  • Miriana Moreno Zivanovich
  • Rachel Gurnett
  • Emperatriz Morales Salgado
  • Ross M Boyce
  • Natalie M Bowman

Abstract

Workers in food processing industries are subject to many occupational health risks and disparities, but little is known about their risk of tickborne diseases. We examined a cohort of Latino individuals working in the meat packing, produce processing, and farming industries and their family members in central North Carolina, where incidence of tickborne infections is high. Blood samples were tested for IgG antibodies against Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiosis (SFGR) and Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Covariates of interest included age, sex, primary language, work industry, indoor vs. outdoor work, home characteristics, medical comorbidities, and travel history. Among 201 Latino food processing workers and their family members, the seroprevalence of SFGR and Ehrlichia was 14.9% and 19.9%, respectively. Almost a third of participants were seropositive for at least one infection. SFGR seropositive individuals were significantly older than seronegative individuals (median 45 [interquartile range 35–55] vs. 33 [14–45] years, p

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa K Cutshaw & Michael Sciaudone & Brenda Vasquez-Martinez & Colleen M McClean & Oksana Kharabora & Katherine Murray & Stephen Strohminger & Miriana Moreno Zivanovich & Rachel Gurnett & Emperatri, 2025. "Seroprevalence of spotted fever rickettsiosis and ehrlichiosis among food processing workers and their families in Latino communities in North Carolina," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005116
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005116
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005116&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.