IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005035.html

“As it is about that, they do as they please”: Women’s experience of the accessibility and acceptability of postabortion care in Kaya, Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Rachidatou Compaoré
  • Clementine Rossier
  • Onikepe Owolabi
  • Adama Baguiya
  • Caron Kim
  • Moussa Zan
  • Nazi Vincent Bagnoa
  • Martin Bangha
  • Seni Kouanda

Abstract

Accessing acceptable postabortion care (PAfor remains a major challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, where abortion is legally restricted and highly stigmatized, particularly for young and socioeconomically disadvantaged women. Evidence on the specific obstacles faced by these groups in rural and semi-urban settings is limited. This study explored women’s experiences with PAC quality in Kaya, a small town in Burkina Faso. We conducted in-depth interviews with women (n = 35) who had participated in a respondent-driven sampling survey on abortion safety in 2021 and had sought PAC for abortion-related complications in formal health facilities. Additional interviews were carried out with representatives of local grassroots associations involved in sexual and reproductive health in the town (n = 8). Thematic analysis was used to examine perceptions of abortion stigma within the community, followed by a typology analysis to identify inequalities in the accessibility (timely, geographically reasonable, and affordable provision of care) and acceptability (patient-centeredness, including cleanliness, privacy, respect and non-judgemental care) of PAC across different categories of women. Both women and association representatives strongly condemned abortion, and the legal exceptions were largely unknown. Abortion stigma was much stronger for young and unmarried women who often sought abortions due to partners denying responsibility and fear of social exclusion. Married women faced less stigma when abortions were linked to closely spaced pregnancies or economic hardship. Fear of prosecution and mistreatment delayed care-seeking, especially among unmarried adolescents and young women. They also reported more verbal abuse, longer waiting times, and a lack of privacy during care, reflecting and reinforcing the heightened stigma they faced. Women with greater socioeconomic resources more often used private facilities, where both accessibility and acceptability were perceived as better, particularly for unmarried women. This study highlights substantial inequalities in the accessibility and acceptability of PAC in Kaya, shaped by women’s marital status, age, and socioeconomic position.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachidatou Compaoré & Clementine Rossier & Onikepe Owolabi & Adama Baguiya & Caron Kim & Moussa Zan & Nazi Vincent Bagnoa & Martin Bangha & Seni Kouanda, 2026. "“As it is about that, they do as they please”: Women’s experience of the accessibility and acceptability of postabortion care in Kaya, Burkina Faso," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005035
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005035&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.