IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic modeling of mortality risk factors in Ebola virus disease using logistic regression on unbalanced panel data from a randomized controlled trial in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Author

Listed:
  • Leader Lawanga Ontshick
  • Jepsy Yango
  • Ange Mubiala Yaya
  • Olivier Tshiani Mbaya
  • Joule Madinga Twan
  • Jean-Michel Nsengi Ntamabyaliro
  • Rosine Ali
  • Patrick Mutombo Lupola
  • Joseph-Desiré Bukweli
  • Sifa Marie-joelle Muchanga
  • Gaston Tona Lutete
  • Placide Mbala Kiangebeni
  • Sabue Mulangu
  • Rostin Mabela Makengo Matendo

Abstract

Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) remains a significant public health threat, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. During the 10th Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the Pamoja Tulinde Maisha clinical trial (PALM-RCT) provided a unique opportunity to evaluate new therapeutic interventions. Despite these advances, limited knowledge exists regarding the dynamic evolution of mortality risk factors in EVD patients. This study aimed to model risk factors associated with mortality using logistic regression on unbalanced panel data from patients enrolled in this trial.We conducted a retrospective secondary analysis of longitudinal data from 617 EVD patients included in the PALM-RCT. Data were collected at five time points: Day0 (admission), Day7, Day14, Day21, and Day28. A binary logistic regression model was applied at each time point to identify significant predictors of mortality. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess model calibration and internal validation. At Day0 (admission), six significant predictors of mortality were identified: viral load (RT-PCR cycle threshold value), creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), haemorrhage, shortness of breath, and conjunctivitis. By Day7, five predictors emerged: sodium, ASAT, coma, abdominal pain, and shortness of breath. At Day14, two predictors remained significant: ASAT and mental state changes. No significant predictors were identified at Day21 and Day28. The dynamic nature of these risk factors highlights the importance of continuous monitoring throughout the clinical course of EVD.Our study demonstrates that mortality risk factors in EVD patients evolve over time, suggesting that a dynamic approach to patient monitoring is critical. Early risk factors such as viral load and renal function should guide initial interventions, while neurological symptoms and electrolyte imbalances require attention in later stages. These findings support a personalized approach to EVD management, where clinical care is adjusted based on real-time clinical data to improve patient outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Leader Lawanga Ontshick & Jepsy Yango & Ange Mubiala Yaya & Olivier Tshiani Mbaya & Joule Madinga Twan & Jean-Michel Nsengi Ntamabyaliro & Rosine Ali & Patrick Mutombo Lupola & Joseph-Desiré Bukweli &, 2025. "Dynamic modeling of mortality risk factors in Ebola virus disease using logistic regression on unbalanced panel data from a randomized controlled trial in the Democratic Republic of Congo," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004901
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004901
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004901&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.