Author
Listed:
- Maxwell Tii Kumbeni
- Marit L Bovbjerg
- S Marie Harvey
- Chunhuei Chi
- Jeff Luck
Abstract
Previous evidence found that restrictive abortion laws were associated with high incidence of unsafe abortions and abortion-related complications. But few studies have assessed the association of restrictive abortion laws with contraceptive use patterns. Our study examined the role of restrictive abortion laws on contraceptive use among women in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA). We performed secondary data analysis using the most recent Demographic and Health Survey data along with the 2022 abortion law classification data from the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) for 31 countries in SSA. Based on CRR classification, abortion restriction was categorized into three, ordinal levels; broadly liberal, moderately restrictive, and highly-restrictive laws. We conducted multivariable, multilevel logistic regression analysis to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The analysis also included multivariable imputation by chained equations to account for missing data. A weighted sample of 453,195 women of reproductive age (15–49 years) were included. Thirty-nine percent and 49% of women lived in countries with moderately-and highly-restrictive abortion laws, respectively. Women in countries with moderately-and highly-restrictive abortion laws were 0.62 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.65) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.93) times as likely to use modern contraceptives, respectively, compared to women in countries with broadly liberal abortion laws. However, in countries that had policies that supported adolescents to access contraceptives, women overall were more likely to use contraceptives. Liberalizing abortion laws and implementing policies that support women’s autonomy in contraceptive decision-making could enhance contraceptive use among women in SSA.
Suggested Citation
Maxwell Tii Kumbeni & Marit L Bovbjerg & S Marie Harvey & Chunhuei Chi & Jeff Luck, 2025.
"The role of restrictive abortion laws on modern contraceptive use in Sub Saharan Africa,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-15, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004875
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004875
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.