IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical review of healthcare financing and a survey of system quality perception among healthcare users in Nigeria (2010–2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Blessing Osagumwendia Josiah
  • Emmanuel Chukwunwike Enebeli
  • Brontie Albertha Duncan
  • Prisca Olabisi Adejumo
  • Chinelo Cleopatra Josiah
  • Lordsfavour Anukam
  • Muhammad Baqir Shittu
  • France Ncube
  • Kelechi Eric Alimele
  • Mercy Emmanuel
  • Oyinye Prosper Martins-Ifeanyi
  • Fawole Israel Opeyemi
  • Oluwadamilare Akingbade
  • Abosede Peace Adebayo
  • Busiroh Mobolape Ibraheem
  • Ubiebo Ataisi Ekenekot
  • Mudiaga Sidney Edafiejire
  • Solomon Oluwaseun Olukoya
  • Ufuomaoghene Jemima Mukoro
  • Siyouneh Baghdasarian
  • Joy Chioma Obialor
  • Gloria Oluwakorede Alao
  • Blessing Onyinye Obialor
  • Ndidi Louis Otoboyor
  • Oghosa Gabriel Josiah
  • Joshua Okonkwo
  • Precious Ebinehita Imoyera
  • Ajao Adewale Gbolabo
  • Blessing Chiamaka Nganwuchu
  • Olukayode Joseph Oladimeji
  • Timothy Wale Olaosebikan
  • Marios Kantaris

Abstract

Nigeria aims to enhance its healthcare quality index score of 84th out of 110 countries and its Sustainable Development Goals Index ranking of 146th out of 166. Due to increased population, disease burden, and patient awareness, healthcare demand is rising, putting pressure on funding and quality assurance. The Nigerian healthcare financing and its impacts are complex; this study gives insights into the trends. This questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey (conducted from June to August 2023) and 2010–2023 health budget analysis examined healthcare finance patterns and user attitudes (utilisation, preference and quality perceptions) in Nigeria. Data from government health budgets and a stratified random sample of 2,212 from nine states, obtained from the socioculturally diverse 237 million population, were analysed with a focus on trends, proportions, frequency distributions, and tests of association. Results show that the average rating of healthcare experiences did not vary significantly over the last decade. Healthcare system quality was rated mainly poor or very poor; structure (74.09%), services (61.66%), and cost (60.89%). While 87.36% used government healthcare facilities, 85.00% paid out-of-pocket, and 72.60% of them were dissatisfied with the value for money. Despite a preference for government facilities (71.43%), respondents cited high costs (62.75%), poor funding (85.65%), inadequate staffing (90.73%), and lack of essential medicines (88.47%) as major challenges. The budget analysis reveals an average government healthcare fund allocation of $7.12 compared with an estimated expenditure of $82.75 per person annually. Nigeria allocates only an average of 0.37% of GDP and 4.61% of the national budget to healthcare, comprising a maximum of 13.56% of total health expenditure. This study emphasises the urgent need for policy reforms and implementations to improve Nigeria’s healthcare financing and service quality. Targeted interventions are essential to address systemic challenges and meet population needs while aligning with international health services and best standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Blessing Osagumwendia Josiah & Emmanuel Chukwunwike Enebeli & Brontie Albertha Duncan & Prisca Olabisi Adejumo & Chinelo Cleopatra Josiah & Lordsfavour Anukam & Muhammad Baqir Shittu & France Ncube & , 2025. "Critical review of healthcare financing and a survey of system quality perception among healthcare users in Nigeria (2010–2023)," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004615
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004615
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004615&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004615?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.