Author
Listed:
- Olunike Rebecca Abodunrin
- Folahanmi Tomiwa Akinsolu
- Oluwabukola Mary Ola
- Mobolaji Timothy Olagunju
- Vivienne Ferife
- Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa
- Ishak Kayode Lawal
- George Uchenna Eleje
- Oliver Chukwujekwu Ezechi
Abstract
HPV self-sampling has the potential to improve early detection of cervical cancer among women living with HIV (WLHIV), but its acceptability varies, creating implementation challenges, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to assess the acceptability of HPV self-sampling among WLHIV. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Academic Medical Ultimate, Cochrane databases, and Google Scholar. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022299781). Inclusion criteria were based on population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. Statistical analysis was done with R Studio version 4.3.2, and data abstraction was performed in Microsoft Excel. The analysis included 14 studies on the acceptability of HPV self-sampling among WLHIV. The overall acceptability rate was 73%. The pooled data showed that 94% felt comfortable with self-sampling, 72% found it easy to use, 10% reported pain, 14% felt embarrassed, and 41% felt confident about the process. The study found that a majority of WLHIV accepted HPV self-sampling, a higher rate than in the general female population. Many participants had concerns about the method’s efficacy. This indicates that while WLHIV generally views self-sampling positively, additional education and support are needed to improve their confidence in its accuracy and reliability.
Suggested Citation
Olunike Rebecca Abodunrin & Folahanmi Tomiwa Akinsolu & Oluwabukola Mary Ola & Mobolaji Timothy Olagunju & Vivienne Ferife & Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa & Ishak Kayode Lawal & George Uchenna Eleje & Oliver Ch, 2025.
"Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling among women living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-22, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004605
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004605
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.