Author
Listed:
- Phoene Mesa Oware
- Gregory Omondi
- Celestine Adipo
- Mohamed Adow
- Conrad Wanyama
- Dan Odallo
- Nelly Bosire
- Lawrence Okong’o
- Michuki Maina
- Jalemba Aluvaala
- Peter Ngwatu
- David Githanga
- Doris Kinuthia
- Irene Amadi
- Grace Rukwaro
- Linet Kerubo
- Cynthia Amisi
- Allan Govoga
- Janette Karimi
- Ali Kahtra
- Andrew Mulwa
- Patrick Amoth
- Ambrose Agweyu
- Fred Were
Abstract
Reliable health information systems (HIS) are critical for effective decision-making in the delivery of Primary Health Care and Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Nutrition (PHC/RMNCAH+N) services. In Kenya, the District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2) platform serves as the primary HIS for tracking health indicators. This qualitative study explored perceptions of DHIS2 data accuracy and use for decision-making among PHC/RMNCAH+N stakeholders across 15 counties in Kenya. 89 Key Informant Interviews were conducted with PHC/RMNCAH+N stakeholders, to explore experiences, barriers, and facilitators of DHIS2 data use. Thematic network analysis was employed to identify recurrent themes and generate insights into the utility of DHIS2-generated information. Sociotechnical challenges included limited technical capacity among health staff, inadequate analytical skills, and reliance on a small pool of Health Records Information Officers (HRIOs). However, positive practices emerged, such as the use of DHIS2 dashboards and user-friendly outputs, which were valued for supporting evidence-based decision-making and advocacy, particularly at higher levels of health management. In some counties, visual displays of data, including scorecards and performance trends, facilitated budget advocacy and community engagement. Contextual challenges and constraints, such as use of inconsistent data collection tools across counties post-devolution, human resource shortages, and limited integration of private sector data, contributed to incomplete reporting. These challenges underpinned perceived inaccuracy of DHIS2 data, arguably, hindering the complete reliance on DHIS2 data for planning and decision making. The study highlights the need for targeted investments to improve DHIS2 data accuracy and use through stronger stakeholder coordination, enhanced data synthesis skills, and fostering a culture of data ownership among a wide range of stakeholders in health, including political actors.. Addressing these gaps will contribute to improvement in DHIS2 data quality, enhanced ownership and reliance on DHIS2 data by PHC/RMNCAH+N stakeholders for decision making in Kenya.
Suggested Citation
Phoene Mesa Oware & Gregory Omondi & Celestine Adipo & Mohamed Adow & Conrad Wanyama & Dan Odallo & Nelly Bosire & Lawrence Okong’o & Michuki Maina & Jalemba Aluvaala & Peter Ngwatu & David Githanga &, 2025.
"Perceived accuracy and utilisation of DHIS2 data for health decision making and advocacy in Kenya: A Qualitative Study,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-22, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004508
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004508
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.