IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Care-seeking for diarrheal illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kirsten E Wiens
  • Marissa H Miller
  • Daniel J Costello
  • Ashlynn P Solomon
  • Skye M Hilbert
  • Andrea G Shipper
  • Elizabeth C Lee
  • Andrew S Azman

Abstract

Monitoring and treating diarrheal illness often relies on individuals seeking care at hospitals or clinics. Cases that seek care through pharmacies and community health workers (CHW) are frequently excluded from disease burden estimates, which are used to allocate mitigation resources. Studies on care-seeking behavior can help identify these gaps but typically focus on children under five, even though diarrheal diseases like cholera and Enterotoxigenic E. coli affect all age groups. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of individuals seeking care for themselves or their children with diarrhea, considering different age groups, case definitions, and study settings. We conducted a systematic review of population-based primary research studies published during 2000–2024 that examined care-seeking behavior for diarrhea. We included 166 studies from 62 countries. Hospitals and clinics were the most common source of care sought outside the home, with CHW and health posts rarely reported. Using a random-effects meta-analysis, we found substantial heterogeneity in care-seeking between studies from low- and middle-income countries (I2 = 99.3) and estimated that the proportion of diarrhea cases seeking care at a hospital or clinic was 32.8% on average (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 28.1% to 37.9%; prediction interval 3.3% to 87.5%). Although there were trends toward higher care-seeking for children compared to adults, substantial variation existed between studies, and the differences were not significant. We estimated that the adjusted odds of seeking care at a hospital or clinic were significantly higher for severe diarrhea and cholera compared to general diarrhea (Odds Ratio 3.43; 95% CI 1.71 to 6.88). Our findings confirm that passive surveillance through hospitals and clinics may substantially undercount the number of people with diarrhea, particularly those with milder symptoms, although this proportion varied widely. Additionally, our findings underscore the importance of including care-seeking questions across all age groups in future studies, as we cannot assume lower care-seeking for adults across all settings. Our study was limited by fewer data on care-seeking from health posts, traditional healers, and CHW compared to hospitals and clinics, highlighting a need for further research on these sources of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirsten E Wiens & Marissa H Miller & Daniel J Costello & Ashlynn P Solomon & Skye M Hilbert & Andrea G Shipper & Elizabeth C Lee & Andrew S Azman, 2025. "Care-seeking for diarrheal illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004483
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004483
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004483&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.