IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004480.html

Leveraging current capacity to address the high prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in South Africa: Modelling potential costs and benefits of near point-of-care GeneXpert testing for STIs

Author

Listed:
  • Nkgomeleng A Lekodeba
  • Katherine Snyman
  • Brooke E Nichols
  • Lise Jamieson

Abstract

South Africa has high sexually transmitted infections (STIs) prevalence and currently implements syndromic management, which has limitations including untreated asymptomatic infections and excess antibiotic use. Diagnostic tools like GeneXpert may offer potential improvements. We evaluated potential costs and benefits of GeneXpert for STIs testing. We developed a static analytical model using existing data over a one-year time horizon (January-December 2024) from a provider perspective. We estimated costs (2024 USD), outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of syndromic management and multiple near point-of-care (i.e., off-site laboratory) GeneXpert testing scenarios for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Target groups included symptomatic individuals, antenatal care (ANC) attendees, and HIV testers. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was conducted on key parameters. Cost per person, and per person correctly diagnosed and treated ranged from $21-$29 under syndromic management and $88-$755 in GeneXpert scenarios. Syndromic management cost the healthcare system an estimated $24.1 million per year; symptomatic GeneXpert testing would cost substantially more: $102.1-$207.8 million, and $300.9 million-$2.1 billion for GeneXpert scenarios involving symptomatic individuals, ANC attendees, and HIV testers. GeneXpert testing reduces excess antibiotic use by up to 88% compared to syndromic management. Of scenarios modelled, three were on the cost-effectiveness frontier: syndromic management, S4: symptomatic adults and adolescent girls and young women HIV testers, and S8: symptomatic adults, ANC attendees and HIV testers. While syndromic management was least costly, incremental cost per additional person correctly diagnosed and treated was $863 (S4) and $1,064 (S8). These scenarios would cost $3.5 and $12.0 billion over 5-years, respectively, compared to $146.0 million in syndromic management. Staff and diagnostic cost were the most influential parameter in sensitivity analysis. Prioritizing GeneXpert testing for symptomatic individuals and high-risk groups (e.g., HIV testers) can improve STI management but requires additional investment. These findings support the need for targeted strategies to optimise STI control.

Suggested Citation

  • Nkgomeleng A Lekodeba & Katherine Snyman & Brooke E Nichols & Lise Jamieson, 2026. "Leveraging current capacity to address the high prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in South Africa: Modelling potential costs and benefits of near point-of-care GeneXpert testing for STIs," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004480
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004480
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004480&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004480?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.