Author
Listed:
- Issa Kalossi
- Dielika Coulibaly
- Kassoum Alou N’Diaye
- Modibo Salia Drame
- Djibril Sissoko
- Thiery Almont
- Kassoum Kayentao
Abstract
The shortage of medical professionals in rural and remote areas is a global issue that significantly challenges equitable healthcare delivery. Worldwide, various studies have examined the motivations of medical professionals in choosing their practice location. However, for Mali, this topic remains underexplored, motivating us to conduct this study to identify factors influencing physicians’ workplace decisions in Mali. We conducted a cross-sectional study targeting physicians and final-year medical students. Using simple random sampling, we selected 358 respondents, 69% of whom were physicians. Data were collected via structured questionnaires assessing sociodemographic characteristics, professional aspirations, and factors influencing workplace preferences. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with rural practice preference. Approximately 38% of the respondents preferred rural areas for their practice, primarily citing career development and opportunities for continuing education (38%). The likelihood of choosing rural practice was higher (OR = 5.09; 95% CI = 2.52-10.8) among participants with family residing in rural areas. This study highlights both personal and systemic factors shaping physicians’ workplace choices in Mali. Interventions aimed at strengthening rural practice appeal should prioritize professional development opportunities and support systems for those with rural backgrounds. Tailored strategies addressing these motivations could enhance equitable healthcare workforce distribution in Mali.
Suggested Citation
Issa Kalossi & Dielika Coulibaly & Kassoum Alou N’Diaye & Modibo Salia Drame & Djibril Sissoko & Thiery Almont & Kassoum Kayentao, 2025.
"Determinants of practice location choices among physicians and medical students in Mali: Insights into addressing medical deserts through evidence-based strategies,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-12, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004399
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004399
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.