IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the challenges of estimating the target population in calculation of routine infant immunization coverage in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Karanja-Chege
  • Ambrose Agweyu
  • Fred Were
  • Michael Boele van Hensbroek
  • William Ogallo

Abstract

Target population estimation for immunization coverage calculations from census data is often inaccurate. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the traditional census extrapolation method in comparison with three alternative approaches: the Cohort-Component Population Projections Method (CCPPM), using the Expanded Program on Immunisation (EPI) numerators – BCG and DTP1 doses as denominators, and estimates derived from first antenatal care clinic (ANC1) visits. We obtained target population estimates in Kenya from 1999 - 2023 using all 4 methods with data for ANC1 available only for 2020–2023. We assessed the accuracy of the estimates for 2003–2018 by computing the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r), excluding outliers. A sub-analysis for the period 2020–2023 included ANC1 data. The CCPPM method had the largest population estimates while the census-based method had pronounced discontinuities at the census years. The CCPPM method compared to the DTP1 doses was associated with the greatest error magnitude (MAE = 212917.19 and MAPE = 18.18) while the DTP1 doses and census-based methods showed the smallest error (MAE = 44317.16 and MAPE = 3.77). Sub-analysis of target populations for the period 2020–2023 showed similar upward trends except for the census-based method which exhibited a significantly divergent trajectory. Comparison between the ANC1 and DTP1 doses showed the strongest linear correlation (r = 1.00). Although sub-national analysis was not done and there was the significant challenge of missing data, the results nevertheless reveal significant inaccuracies in the current target population estimation methods which may have serious implications on immunisation coverage assessments. Immunisation programs should utilise diverse sources of data and triangulate results as a more pragmatic approach for approximating the target populations for vaccination in the absence of well-established civil registration systems. Additionally, more research is warranted to address this gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Karanja-Chege & Ambrose Agweyu & Fred Were & Michael Boele van Hensbroek & William Ogallo, 2025. "Addressing the challenges of estimating the target population in calculation of routine infant immunization coverage in Kenya," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-8, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004298
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004298
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004298&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.