IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among essential workers in long term care and retirement homes in Ontario, Canada: A descriptive cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Fahim
  • Siyi Wang
  • Nimitha Paul
  • Karen Colwill
  • Roya Dayam
  • Jamie M Boyd
  • Huiting Ma
  • Vincenza Gruppuso
  • Ana Mrazovac
  • Jessica Firman
  • Anjali Patel
  • Vanessa Bach
  • Keelia Quinn de Launay
  • Alyson Takaoka
  • Vanja Grubac
  • Anne-Claude Gingras
  • Sharon E Straus
  • Sharmistha Mishra

Abstract

Understanding patterns of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among Long-Term Care Home and Retirement Home (LTCH/RH) staff is critical to designing effective public health interventions. We estimated SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among LTCH/RH staff in Ontario, Canada between May 2021-October 2022 using a cross-sectional analysis. Eligible participants completed a demographic questionnaire and provided a dried blood spot sample. Positive seroprevalence was defined as the proportion of individuals in a population who were positive for a SARS-CoV-2 infection, determined using anti-nucleocapsid total IgG antibodies analyzed with a validated chemiluminescent ELISA. We report age-adjusted prevalence ratios [PR; confidence interval, CI] by participant socio-demographic, household, neighbourhood, and occupational characteristics and stratified the analyses over two time periods (period 1: 2021-05-17 to 2021-12-31; period 2: 2022-01-02 to 2022-10-25). A total of 603 staff were included in our analysis; n=235 (39%) were enrolled in period 1 and n=368 (61%) were enrolled in period 2. Seroprevalence was 24% and 44% in periods 1 and 2, respectively. Age-adjusted prevalence ratios were nearly 2-fold higher among Black [PR 1.78; CI 1.28-2.48], East and Southeast Asian [PR 1.55, CI 1.18-2.04] and other racialized participants [PR 1.42, CI 1.03-1.96] compared to White participants. We did not observe a pattern across household characteristics, although we observed a trend towards higher seropositivity among participants living in COVID-19 hotspots. Prevalence ratios were lower for participants in higher income neighbourhoods [PR 0.72, CI 0.58-0.98]. We did not observe variability in seroprevalence across occupational characteristics with the exception of paid sick leave which was higher among participants with home-provided paid sick leave at the time of the survey [PR 0.58, CI 0.45-0.75]. Among LTCH/RH staff, we found important sources of variability of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and strong correlations with socioeconomic disparities. Our findings show the importance of designing equity-rooted health interventions that recognize the intersection between community and the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Fahim & Siyi Wang & Nimitha Paul & Karen Colwill & Roya Dayam & Jamie M Boyd & Huiting Ma & Vincenza Gruppuso & Ana Mrazovac & Jessica Firman & Anjali Patel & Vanessa Bach & Keelia Quinn de , 2025. "Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among essential workers in long term care and retirement homes in Ontario, Canada: A descriptive cross-sectional study," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004294
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004294
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004294&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.