IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathways and processes to adopting or switching to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Sunny Roy
  • Megan D Wysong
  • Erica N Rosser
  • Ishani Sheth
  • Casey Geddes
  • Rupali J Limaye
  • Joseph G Rosen

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently endorsed a single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination (HPVV) schedule, but adoption of the revised immunization schedule has not been uniform, notably in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with outsized cervical cancer burdens. We sought to characterize the sequence of events, as well as actors/institutions involved, that facilitate or impede country-level decision-making related to the HPVV schedule. From September 2023 to February 2024, we conducted 66 semi-structured interviews with national immunization stakeholders from 19 LMICs in Africa and Asia, sampled purposively by the maturity of the HPVV program and HPVV schedule. Using purposive text analysis to synthesize emerging insights from interviews, we qualitatively discerned a sequence of decision-making pathways and processes, including actors involved at each stage of the decision-making continuum, related to adoption or switch to an HPVV single-dose schedule. We identified six key sequential steps LMICs follow when deciding on an HPV dosing schedule. Firstly, the new recommendation emerges where WHO and the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) release new HPV vaccine recommendations. Second, the information is shared with the Ministry of Health (MoH) and Expanded Programme for Immunization (EPI). The MoH is informed, and they convene a National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) to assess the new HPV vaccine schedule recommendation. Third, there is the review and consideration of evidence. The NITAG reviews evidence on factors like cost-effectiveness, supply chain, disease burden, and anticipated vaccine hesitancy. Fourth, the NITAG deliberates, achieves consensus, and submits a recommendation to the MoH, which endorses the NITAG’s recommendation or requests additional evidence/information before rendering a final decision on the immunization schedule. Fifth and finally, the Interagency Coordination Committee (ICC) reviews the MoH’s recommendation and provides final authorization before changes to the HPV immunization schedule is communicated to Gavi.

Suggested Citation

  • Sunny Roy & Megan D Wysong & Erica N Rosser & Ishani Sheth & Casey Geddes & Rupali J Limaye & Joseph G Rosen, 2025. "Pathways and processes to adopting or switching to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004245
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004245
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004245&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.