IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between national action and trends in antibiotic resistance: an analysis of 73 countries from 2000 to 2023

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Søgaard Jørgensen
  • Luong Nguyen Thanh
  • Ege Pehlivanoğlu
  • Franziska Klein
  • Didier Wernli
  • Dusan Jasovsky
  • Athena Aktipis
  • Robert R Dunn
  • Yrjö Gröhn
  • Guillaume Lhermie
  • H Morgan Scott
  • Eili Y Klein

Abstract

The world’s governments have agreed on actions to address the challenge of antibiotic resistance. This raises the question of what level of national action is associated with improved outcomes, including both slower growth and lower levels of antibiotic resistance. Answering this question is challenged by variation in data availability and quality as well as disruptive events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigate the association between level of national action and temporal trends in multiple indicators related to health system capacity, antibiotic use (ABU), absolute rates of resistance (ABR) and a Drug Resistance Index (DRI). Using the Global Database for Tracking Antimicrobial Resistance (TrACSS) to construct an index of national action, we apply cross-sectional regression across 73 countries to estimate the association between the level of action in 2016 and trends in national indicators (2000–2016). We find that national action is consistently associated with improved linear or categorical trends in all groups of indicators. Reductions are associated with a relatively high action index (range 0–4) for ABU (median 2.8, 25–75% quartile 2.6-3.3), ABR (3.0, 2.4-3.4), and DRI (3.5, 3.1-3.6). These associations are robust to the inclusion of other contextual factors related to socio-economic conditions, human population density, animal production and climate. Since 2016, a majority of both Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) and High-Income Countries (HICs) report increased action on repeated questions, while one third of countries report reduced action. The main limitations in interpretation are heterogeneity in data availability and in when actions have been implemented. Our findings highlight the importance of national action to address the domestic situation related to antibiotic resistance and indicate the value of both incremental changes in reducing adversity of outcomes and the need for high levels of action in delivering reduced levels of resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Søgaard Jørgensen & Luong Nguyen Thanh & Ege Pehlivanoğlu & Franziska Klein & Didier Wernli & Dusan Jasovsky & Athena Aktipis & Robert R Dunn & Yrjö Gröhn & Guillaume Lhermie & H Morgan Scott & , 2025. "Association between national action and trends in antibiotic resistance: an analysis of 73 countries from 2000 to 2023," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004127
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004127
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004127&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.