IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women’s self-help group participation and discussion of reproductive coercion: Associations with past experiences of violence among family planning clients in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmine Uysal
  • Nicole E Johns
  • Chi-Chi Undie
  • Wilson Liambila
  • Erin Pearson
  • Elizabeth Reed
  • Jay G Silverman

Abstract

Reproductive coercion (RC) and intimate partner violence (IPV) are prevalent in Kenya and undermine women’s reproductive agency; community-based women’s groups may offer an opportunity to address these issues. We quantitatively examined women’s participation in women-only self-help groups, described discussions of RC within these groups, and assessed differences based on prior experiences of RC and IPV among a clinic-based sample of Kenyan women seeking family planning services to inform future programming. Data were collected from 659 women of reproductive age seeking family planning services at six private clinics in Nairobi as part of the baseline for an intervention to address RC and IPV within family planning counseling. We used descriptive statistics, bivariate hypothesis testing, and adjusted mixed-effect logistic regression models to examine the relationship between self-help group participation and lifetime experience of RC and IPV. Using the same methods, we analyzed group discussions about RC in relation to lifetime experiences of abuse among women who had recently participated in groups. Additionally, we explored associations between RC discussions and the type of self-help group (e.g., economic, charitable) using bivariate tests. Over half of women reported prior participation in women-only self-help groups, with most participating in economic groups (63%). More than one in two women reported prior IPV and one in three reported prior RC. Self-help group participation was not significantly associated with prior experiences of RC or IPV. However, women who had ever experienced RC were more likely to report discussions about RC within groups (AOR 1.82 95% CI 1.06-3.14). Discussions of RC were less common in economic groups. Women-only self-help group participation is common and acceptable among Kenyan women, including those experiencing violence. However, economic groups—though widespread—discuss RC less often, indicating a key opportunity to integrate RC/IPV programming into these settings to strengthen community-based support.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmine Uysal & Nicole E Johns & Chi-Chi Undie & Wilson Liambila & Erin Pearson & Elizabeth Reed & Jay G Silverman, 2025. "Women’s self-help group participation and discussion of reproductive coercion: Associations with past experiences of violence among family planning clients in Kenya," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004087
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004087
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004087&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.