IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expanding two-way texting for post-operative follow-up: A cost analysis of the implementation and scale-up in routine voluntary medical male circumcision settings in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Molly Unsworth
  • Isabella Fabens
  • Geoffrey Setswe
  • Khumbulani Moyo
  • Jacqueline Pienaar
  • Calsile Makhele
  • Motshana Phohole
  • Nelson Igaba
  • Sizwe Hlongwane
  • Maria Sardini
  • Tracy Dong
  • Monisha Sharma
  • Hannock Tweya
  • Felex Ndebele
  • Marrianne Holec
  • Caryl Feldacker

Abstract

Up to 98% of adult voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) clients heal without adverse events (AEs) in South Africa and in the sub-Saharan Africa region. Yet, all clients in South Africa are required to attend in-person reviews, creating added effort for providers and clients. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) using our fee-free, open-source, two-way texting (2wT) approach showed that males could independently monitor their healing with nurse-led telehealth support. 2wT was more cost-effective than routine visits for quality post-operative monitoring. The objectives of this study were:1) assess the additive cost of 2wT vs. standard of care (SoC) during a stepped wedge design (SWD) expansion trial; 2) determine the cost of augmenting 2wT implementation with dedicated personnel during peak VMMC periods; and 3) estimate the cost savings of 2wT from the payer perspective if scaled in routine settings. Data were collected from routine financial reports and complemented by previous RCT time-motion estimates. We conducted activity-based costing of SWD and peak season periods. Sensitivity analysis to estimates 2wT costs at scale. Data included 6,842 males; 2,586 (38%) opted for 2wT. 2wT participants attended an average of zero in-person visits; SoC males had an average of 2 in-person visits. Under 2wT, quality care improved: AE ascertainment increased while loss to follow-up decreased. Given a VMMC population of 10,000 adults, scenario analysis suggests that: 1) 2wT becomes cost neutral with 45% 2wT enrollment; 2) 2wT saves $0.29/client with 60% 2wT enrollment; and 3) 2wT saves $0.46/client with 80% 2wT enrollment. When scaled, 2wT appears to significantly reduce healthcare system costs while improving the quality of post-operative care without additional client costs. Further scale-up of 2wT for eligible males across VMMC and other post-operative contexts in South Africa would likely increase cost savings while dramatically reducing the burden of in-person visits on patients and clinics.

Suggested Citation

  • Molly Unsworth & Isabella Fabens & Geoffrey Setswe & Khumbulani Moyo & Jacqueline Pienaar & Calsile Makhele & Motshana Phohole & Nelson Igaba & Sizwe Hlongwane & Maria Sardini & Tracy Dong & Monisha S, 2025. "Expanding two-way texting for post-operative follow-up: A cost analysis of the implementation and scale-up in routine voluntary medical male circumcision settings in South Africa," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004049
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004049
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004049&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.