IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Women’s Pregnancy Intentions, Decision-Making, and Factors Influencing Reproductive Choices After Genital Fistula Repair in Uganda: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mekaleya Tilahun
  • Hadija Nalubwama
  • Monica Getahun
  • Justus K Barageine
  • Alison M El Ayadi

Abstract

Female genital fistula is a debilitating injury that may affect as many as two million women globally. While studies have examined women’s fertility intentions in Uganda and sub-Saharan Africa broadly, few have explored the factors influencing pregnancy decision-making among women who have undergone fistula repair. We conducted in-depth interviews with 40 women who had undergone fistula repair. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed into English, and coded using a group-developed collaborative coding framework. Oriented by the socio-ecological framework, we reviewed factors contributing to pregnancy desire and decision-making for women who became pregnant and those who did not following fistula repair. Factors influencing pregnancy desire included partner support, financial circumstances, number of children, and health knowledge and perspectives. Women’s own beliefs about their ability to become pregnant and their fears around surgeries and fistula recurrence also influenced pregnancy desire. Participants desiring pregnancy but experiencing infertility expressed various mental health impacts including feelings of hurt, isolation, and yearning, and described infertility stigma. Finally, societal expectations of women to assume childbearing and prioritize home responsibilities influenced participants’ decisions to pursue pregnancy. However, discordance between partners or infertility resulted in various consequences, such as women becoming pregnant to fulfill their partner’s needs, lying to their partner about their pregnancy status, or dissolution of the relationship. A nuanced understanding of pregnancy intentions and decision-making following fistula repair can help inform patient-centered post-repair pregnancy counseling to support the unique needs of women.

Suggested Citation

  • Mekaleya Tilahun & Hadija Nalubwama & Monica Getahun & Justus K Barageine & Alison M El Ayadi, 2025. "Understanding Women’s Pregnancy Intentions, Decision-Making, and Factors Influencing Reproductive Choices After Genital Fistula Repair in Uganda: A Qualitative Study," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004015
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004015&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.