IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low-dose calcium supplementation during pregnancy in low and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Happiness P Saronga
  • Pratibha Dwarkanath
  • Hening Cui
  • Alfa Muhihi
  • Anura V Kurpad
  • V Sri Poornima
  • Mary M Sando
  • R Poornima
  • Cara Yelverton
  • Honorati M Masanja
  • Christopher R Sudfeld
  • Andrea B Pembe
  • Wafaie W Fawzi
  • Nicolas A Menzies

Abstract

Calcium supplementation during pregnancy can reduce the risk of preeclampsia and preterm birth. Few countries have implemented WHO-recommended high-dose calcium supplementation (1500–2000mg/day), due to adherence and cost concerns. However, low-dose calcium supplementation (one 500mg tablet daily) has recently been shown to be similarly efficacious as high-dose supplementation. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of low-dose calcium supplementation during pregnancy, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with low dietary calcium intake. To do so, we conducted a mathematical modelling analysis in which we estimated the lifetime health outcomes (cases, deaths, and DALYs averted) and costs of low-dose calcium supplementation provided through routine antenatal care to women giving birth in 2024, as compared to no supplementation. We assessed costs (2022 USD) from a health system perspective, including cost-savings from averted care for preeclampsia and preterm birth. This analysis showed that low-dose calcium supplementation could prevent 1.3 (95% uncertainty interval: 0.2, 2.6) million preterm births (a 10% (2, 18) reduction), 1.8 (1.0, 2.8) million preeclampsia cases (a 23% (14, 32) reduction), as well as 5.9 (1.3, 12.9) million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Intervention costs would be $267 (220, 318) million and produce cost-savings of $56 (26, 86) million, with incremental costs per DALY averted of $90 (38, 389) across all countries, and a return on investment of 19.1 (3.8, 39.5). The intervention was cost-effective in 119 of 129 countries modeled when compared to setting-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds. While there was substantial uncertainty in several inputs, cost-effectiveness conclusions were robust to parameter uncertainty and alternative analytic assumptions. Based on these results, low-dose calcium supplementation provided during pregnancy is cost-effective for prevention of preeclampsia and preterm birth in most LMICs.

Suggested Citation

  • Happiness P Saronga & Pratibha Dwarkanath & Hening Cui & Alfa Muhihi & Anura V Kurpad & V Sri Poornima & Mary M Sando & R Poornima & Cara Yelverton & Honorati M Masanja & Christopher R Sudfeld & Andre, 2025. "Low-dose calcium supplementation during pregnancy in low and middle-income countries: A cost-effectiveness analysis," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004002
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004002&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.