IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0003928.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic evaluation of caregiver interventions for children with developmental disabilities: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Kairu
  • Edwin Dzoro
  • Vibian Angwenyi
  • Charles Newton
  • Charlotte Hanlon
  • Rosa A Hoekstra
  • Amina Abubakar
  • Edwine Barasa

Abstract

Globally, families with children with developmental disabilities (DDs) experience challenges, including social isolation, stigma, and poverty, especially in low-income settings in Africa. Most children with DDs in Africa remain unidentified and receive no formal support. Caregiver interventions focusing on education and training for the carers/parents have been shown to be adaptable and low intensity in implementation, although the economic evidence is limited. This review aimed to describe the evidence and methodological aspects of economic evaluations for caregiver interventions for DDs. The Arksey and O’Malley framework was applied. Seven electronic databases, grey literature and cited references were systematically searched to identify eligible studies. published from 1993 to 2023. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the Drummond checklist. Data were systematically extracted, tabulated, and qualitatively synthesised using inductive thematic analysis. From 7811 articles, twenty studies all in high-income countries were included, and focused on caregiver interventions for autism spectrum disorder (n = 7), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (n = 6), disruptive behaviour and behaviour problems with ADHD (n = 5), intellectual disabilities (n = 1) and language delay (n = 1). Economic evaluation analyses included cost effectiveness (n = 11), costing (n = 3), cost utility (n = 2), cost consequence (n = 1) cost benefit (n = 1), and combined analyses (n = 2). Nine studies reported the interventions as cost effective and five studies reported the intervention to be cost saving. The main methodological challenges were related to costing, outcome measurement in children and the appropriate time horizon for modelling. Caregiver interventions demonstrate cost-effectiveness, with the available evidence supporting the adoption of the interventions as a promising avenue to strengthen access and reduce the associated healthcare costs. The identified key methodological challenges highlighted further research areas. Prioritizing more economic evaluation studies in this area would inform decision-making on efficient resource allocation, promote inclusivity and equitable access to services for children with DDs.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Kairu & Edwin Dzoro & Vibian Angwenyi & Charles Newton & Charlotte Hanlon & Rosa A Hoekstra & Amina Abubakar & Edwine Barasa, 2025. "Economic evaluation of caregiver interventions for children with developmental disabilities: A scoping review," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003928
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003928
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003928
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003928&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003928?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramesh Lamsal & Jennifer D. Zwicker, 2017. "Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Opportunities and Challenges," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 763-772, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003928. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.